6533b830fe1ef96bd1297909
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Consequences and Conclusion
Barbara Elisabeth Müllersubject
Global justiceArgumentPolitical sciencePosition (finance)Institutional structureCosmopolitanismPositive economicsdescription
This chapter reflects the argument developed in the previous chapters, concluding that cosmopolitanism as nonrelationism is both a distinct and plausible position within the global justice debate. The chapter identifies prominent proponents and excludes others. The chapter also highlights the consequences of cosmopolitanism as nonrelationism for the evaluation and design of institutional structures on the global as well as on the domestic level.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-20 |