6533b831fe1ef96bd1298f15
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Responsiveness to change and reliability of measurement of radiographic joint space width in osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review
Jean Francis MaillefertJean Francis MaillefertElena LosinaElena LosinaWilliam M. ReichmannPhilip G. ConaghanDavid J. HunterDavid J. HunterJeffrey N. KatzJeffrey N. Katzsubject
Research designmedicine.medical_specialtyRadiographKnee JointRadiographyCoefficient of variationBiomedical EngineeringOsteoarthritisARTHROSCOPIC EVALUATIONCHONDROITINS 4Knee JointPLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALArticleX-ray03 medical and health sciencesDOUBLE-BLIND0302 clinical medicineFIXED-FLEXIONRheumatologyStandardized response meanmedicineHumansFluoroscopyOrthopedics and Sports MedicineReliability (statistics)Observer Variation030203 arthritis & rheumatology030222 orthopedicsSTANDING ANTEROPOSTERIORmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industry[SCCO.NEUR] Cognitive science/NeuroscienceDISEASE PROGRESSIONReproducibility of ResultsResponsivenessOsteoarthritis Kneemedicine.diseaseReliabilityConfidence interval3. Good healthGLUCOSAMINE SULFATEResearch DesignFluoroscopyPhysical therapyKnee osteoarthritisSENSITIVITYbusinessMEDIAL TIBIAL PLATEAUdescription
Import JabRef | WosArea Orthopedics; Rheumatology; International audience; Objective: The goal of this systematic review was to report the responsiveness to change and reliability of conventional radiographic joint space width (JSW) measurement. Method: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases using the following search criteria: [osteoarthritis (OA) (MeSH)] AND (knee) AND (X-ray OR radiography OR diagnostic imaging OR radiology OR disease progression) AND (joint space OR JSW or disease progression). We assessed responsiveness by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM). We assessed reliability using intra- and inter-reader intra-class correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Random-effects models were used to pool results from multiple studies. Results were stratified by study duration, design, techniques of obtaining radiographs, and measurement method. Results: We identified 998 articles using the search terms. Of these, 32 articles (43 estimates) reported data on responsiveness of JSW measurement and 24 (50 estimates) articles reported data on measures of reliability. The overall pooled SRM was 0.33 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26, 0.41]. Responsiveness of change in JSW measurement was improved substantially in studies of greater than 2 years duration (0.57). Further stratifying this result in studies of greater than 2 years duration, radiographs obtained with the knee in a flexed position yielded an SRM of 0.71. Pooled intra-reader ICC was estimated at 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.00) and the intra-reader CV estimated at 3.0(95% CI: 2.0, 4.0). Pooled inter-reader ICC was estimated at 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.99) and the inter-reader CV estimated at 3.4% (95% CI: 1.3%, 5.5%). Conclusions: Measurement of JSW obtained from radiographs in persons with knee is reliable. These data will be useful to clinicians who are planning RCTs where the change in minimum JSW is the outcome of interest. (C) 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011-05-01 |