6533b833fe1ef96bd129b7fb

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Difficulties in distinguishing between an atlas fracture and a congenital posterior atlas arch defect in postmortem analysis.

Juan A. Sanchis-gimenoF Martinez-sorianoEsther Blanco-perezVicente Martinez-sanjuanLuis Aparicio

subject

Microscopymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryRadiographyeducationComputed tomographyAnatomyPosterior archPathology and Forensic MedicineVertebraCongenital AbnormalitiesDiagnosis Differentialmedicine.anatomical_structureAtlas (anatomy)medicineHumansSpinal FracturesFemaleCervical AtlasbusinessAtlas archTomography X-Ray ComputedLawAged

description

We found one atlas from a sample of 148 skeletons (0.67%) that presented different anatomical variations which made it difficult to determine whether the vertebra had an atlas fracture, an unusual Type B posterior atlas arch defect, or a combination of both. We carried out a stereomicroscopy, radiographic, and computerized tomography scan study that revealed that the dry atlas we found presented a very uncommon congenital Type B posterior atlas arch defect, simulating a fracture. In short, the present paper has revealed that differentiating Type B posterior atlas arch defects from fractures in post-mortem dry vertebrae is more difficult than expected. Thus we believe that it can be easier than expected to mistake Type B posterior arch defects for fractures and vice versa in postmortem studies.

10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.06.016https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25037687