6533b834fe1ef96bd129cc53

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Observationally Weak TGFs in the RHESSI Data

Thomas GjestelandNikolai ØStgaardN. BergeK. H. Albrechtsen

subject

Atmospheric Science010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences[SDU.STU.GP]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Geophysics [physics.geo-ph]Atmospheric ElectricityPopulationHard radiationAstrophysics01 natural sciencesLightningterrestrial gamma‐ray flahesAerosol and CloudsLatitude0103 physical sciencesEarth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)RHESSIobservationally weakeducation010303 astronomy & astrophysicsResearch Articles0105 earth and related environmental sciencesPhysicseducation.field_of_studyGamma rayNetwork datathunderstormsLightningWorld widehard radiationGeophysicsSpace and Planetary ScienceAtmospheric ProcessesThunderstormResearch Article

description

Abstract Terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs) are sub‐millisecond bursts of high energetic gamma radiation associated with intracloud flashes in thunderstorms. In this paper we use the simultaneity of lightning detections by World Wide Lightning Location Network to find TGFs in the Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) data that are too faint to be identified by standard search algorithms. A similar approach has been used in an earlier paper, but here we expand the data set to include all years of RHESSI + World Wide Lightning Location Network data and show that there is a population of observationally weak TGFs all the way down to 0.22 of the RHESSI detection threshold (three counts in the detector). One should note that the majority of these are “normal” TGFs that are produced further away from the subsatellite point (and experience a 1/r 2 effect) or produced at higher latitudes with a lower tropoause and thus experience increased atmospheric attenuation. This supports the idea that the TGF production rate is higher than currently reported. We also show that compared to lightning flashes, TGFs are more partial to ocean and coastal regions than over land.

https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029272