6533b834fe1ef96bd129d42f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation

Manfred SchmittChangiz Mohiyeddini

subject

Equity (economics)ResentmentSociology and Political Sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectAngerInjusticeAnthropologyAnger expressionTraitAssertivenessPsychologyDistributive justiceLawSocial psychologymedia_common

description

At Time 1, 171 students were administered questionnaires for measuring sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI), trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward principles of distributive justice (equality of chances, equity). Two months later (Time 2), 75 of these subjects were treated unfairly in a laboratory situation dealing with competition and achievement behavior. Two justice principles were violated: the equality of chances principle and the equity principle. Four weeks later (Time 3), 32 subjects evaluated the unfair treatment in retrospect. All three occasions were presented as independent studies with the subjects perceiving no connection between them. In line with our hypotheses, we found that immediate and delayed reactions to the unjust treatments depended to a considerable degree on SBI. For example, the combined score of the SBI questionnaire predicted, with a beta weight of .71, a combined rating of three experts who used various sources of objective information (e.g., tape-recorded interactions between subject and experimenter) to estimate the degree to which the subject displayed emotional, verbal, and behavioral resentment against the unfair treatment. At the same time, measures for other constructs (e.g., assertiveness, trait anger, anger expression), which can also be linked theoretically to the criteria, explained either none or a much smaller proportion of variance in reactions to unjust treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02683307