6533b834fe1ef96bd129e14d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Cell Expression During Adjuvant Treatment After Transurethral Resection for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A New Potential Tool to Identify Patients at Higher Risk of Disease Progression

Antonio RussoFabrizio Di MaidaVincenzo SerrettaSimone SforzaAndrea MariLorenzo MasieriRiccardo TelliniAndrea MinerviniMarco CariniAndrea CocciCristina Scalici GesolfoA. CangemiRosalinda Allegro

subject

MaleOncologymedicine.medical_specialtyUrology030232 urology & nephrologyCystectomy03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInterquartile rangeInternal medicineAdjuvant therapyHumansMedicineEpidermal growth factor receptorAgedBladder cancerBladder washingbiologybusiness.industryHazard ratioCancerBiomarkerPrognosismedicine.diseaseConfidence intervalEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)Up-RegulationErbB ReceptorsGene Expression Regulation NeoplasticAdministration IntravesicalTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsOncologyNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)Chemotherapy Adjuvant030220 oncology & carcinogenesisMolecular classificationDisease Progressionbiology.proteinFeasibility StudiesBiomarker (medicine)Femalebusiness

description

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) measurement in bladder washings of patients affected by non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and its prognostic role in identifying risk subgroups and predicting disease recurrence and progression. Patients and Methods Patients with NMIBC treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) from 2012 to 2015 were enrolled. Samples of bladder washings were collected and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction. The cDNA obtained from RNA was used to perform a gene expression analysis by a real time polymerase chain reaction. Results An adequate cellular pellet was obtained in 50 (86.2%) of 58 patients and in 18 (85.7%) of 21 controls. Patients had a median 2.5-, a 1.6- and a 2.8-fold EGFR expression compared with controls before, during, and after adjuvant treatment, respectively. Patients at higher risk had a significantly higher EGFR expression compared with patients at low and intermediate risk when EGFR was measured during (P = .04) and after (P = .001) adjuvant therapy. At a median follow-up of 35.5 months (interquartile range, 19.0-54.8 months), in the high-risk group, patients with overexpression had a significantly lower recurrence-free survival (27.9% vs. 58%), progression-free survival (75.9% vs. 90.2%), and cancer-specific survival (77.7% vs. 93.3%). At multivariable analysis, EGFR overexpression was an additional independent prognostic factor to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring system of disease recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.97) and progression (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.65). Conclusions EGFR overexpression might represent an additional parameter to the current clinical tools for an individualized risk stratification.

10.1016/j.clgc.2019.04.008http://hdl.handle.net/10447/359492