6533b835fe1ef96bd129e9f8
RESEARCH PRODUCT
An insight into water stable isotope signatures in temperate catchment
Konrāds PopovsAlise BabreAija DēliņaAndis Kalvanssubject
Hydrology010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesStable isotope ratioIsoscapesδ18O0207 environmental engineering02 engineering and technology01 natural sciencesEnvironmental science020701 environmental engineeringSubsurface flowSurface runoffSurface waterGroundwaterPhreatic0105 earth and related environmental sciencesWater Science and Technologydescription
Abstract Stable isotopes are used to decipher hydrological processes in watershed research. A two-year monthly monitoring of hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope ratios (δ2H and δ18O) in a temperate catchment in Norther Europa, Latvia was undertaken. Isotope ratios in common water types – raised bog, confined groundwater, unconfined groundwater and surface water – were measured. We found characteristic signatures of isotope ratios for each of these four water types. The average isotope ratios of different water types ranged from −80.8 to −68.3‰ for δ2H and −11.46 to −8.76‰ for δ18O, with standard deviations from 18 to 25‰ and 0.10 to 1.59‰, respectively. The isotope ratios of the stream base flow were consistent with the groundwater isoscape and seasonally enriched by evaporation. Most enriched water are found in raised bogs and large lakes. The most depleted water is found in a spring discharging phreatic groundwater in a forest site with sandy soil. The most enriched water was associated with significant short-lived precipitation events, resulting in impoundment of water on the land surface and its enrichment due to evaporation. The novelty of this study is that this enriched isotope signal is propagated throughout the hydrological system, temporarily albeit significantly shifting isotope ratios of phreatic groundwater and surface runoff. Further case studies are needed to affirm if this is a regionally significant mechanism controlling isotope ratios of surface and subsurface water. The observed difference between the average δ18O of phreatic groundwater at two locations was 0.9‰. We suggest that the differences are due to different land use and soil conditions.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-03-01 | Journal of Hydrology |