6533b835fe1ef96bd129f693

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Evaluation of the registration of temporal series of contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance 3D images of the liver.

Esther DuraL. Marti-bonmatiGuillermo AyalaJ. Domingo

subject

Computer sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectContrast MediaHealth InformaticsImage processingImaging Three-DimensionalLiver tissuemedicineContrast (vision)HumansComputer visionPoint (geometry)media_commonGround truthmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryProcess (computing)Magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputer Science ApplicationsLiverArtificial intelligencebusinessPerfusionSoftwareAlgorithms

description

The registration of 2D and 3D images is one of the key tasks in medical image processing and analysis. Accurate registration is a crucial preprocessing step for many tasks; consequently, the evaluation of its accuracy becomes necessary. Unfortunately, this is a difficult task, especially when no golden pattern (true result) is available and when the signal values may have changed between successive images to be registered. This is the case this paper deals with: we have a series of 3D images, magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the liver and adjacent areas that have to be registered. They have been taken while a contrast is diffused through the liver tissue, so intensity of each observed point changes for two reasons: contrast diffusion/perfusion and deformation of the liver (due to body movement and breathing). In this paper, we introduce a new method to automatically compare two or more registration algorithms applied to the same case of a perfusion magnetic resonance dynamic image so that the best of them can be chosen when no ground truth is available. This is done by modeling the function that gives the intensity at a given point as a functional datum, and using statistical techniques to assess its change in comparison with other functions. An example of the application is shown by comparing two parametrizations of a B-spline based registration algorithm. The main result of the proposed method is a suggestive evidence to guide the physician in the process of selecting a registration algorithm, that recommends the algorithm of minimal complexity but still suitable for the case to be analyzed.

10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.04.015https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22704292