6533b836fe1ef96bd12a1455
RESEARCH PRODUCT
1.5 vs 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Judith HerrmannAlexander IsaakDaniel PaechJürgen F. SchäferKonstantin NikolaouSebastian GassenmaierAlexander RadbruchJulian A. LuetkensAhmed E. Othmansubject
Male3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance ImagingMusculoskeletal imaging2019-20 coronavirus outbreakmedicine.medical_specialtyMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopymedicine.diagnostic_testCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)business.industryImage qualitySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Magnetic resonance imagingGeneral MedicineMagnetic Resonance ImagingmedicineHumansWhole Body ImagingRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingMedical physicsChildbusinessCardiac imagingdescription
ABSTRACT: The second part of this review deals with experiences in neuroradiological and pediatric examinations using modern magnetic resonance imaging systems with 1.5 T and 3 T, with special attention paid to experiences in pediatric cardiac imaging. In addition, whole-body examinations, which are widely used for diagnostic purposes in systemic diseases, are compared with respect to the image quality obtained in different body parts at both field strengths. A systematic overview of the technical differences at 1.5 T and 3 T has been presented in part 1 of this review, as well as several organ-based magnetic resonance imaging applications including musculoskeletal imaging, abdominal imaging, and prostate diagnostics.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-08-20 | Investigative Radiology |