6533b837fe1ef96bd12a2827

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Evaluation of effectiveness of photobiostimulation in alleviating side effects after dental implant surgery. A randomized clinical trial

Marco BaldoniCosme Gay-escodaGianluigi CaccianigaCosimo GallettiMarco PortelliLetizia Perillo

subject

MaleOral Surgical ProceduresAnalgesicCirurgia dentalPainPlaceboPhotobiostimulationImplant surgerylaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineDouble-Blind MethodRandomized controlled trialInterquartile rangelawmedicineHumansOral mucosaGeneral DentistryAged 80 and overDental ImplantsLLLT photobiostimulation pain implant surgery.AnalgesicsPain PostoperativePregnancyImplants dentalsbusiness.industryLLLTResearchDental implantsImplant failureMED/28 - MALATTIE ODONTOSTOMATOLOGICHE030206 dentistrymedicine.disease:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Photobiologymedicine.anatomical_structureFotobiologiaOtorhinolaryngologyAnesthesiaDental surgeryUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASFemaleSurgeryAnalysis of varianceLLLT Photobiostimulation Pain Implant surgerybusinessImplantology

description

Background To assess if photobiostimulation (PBS) alleviates pain intensity/duration and swelling after implant surgery. Material and Methods Sixty subjects (27 male and 33 female, with a mean age of 47,13 8.05 years) were included and randomly assigned to experimental group (implant surgery and photobiostimulation), placebo group (implant surgery and simulated photobiostimulation) and control group (implant surgery only). Inclusion criteria: subjects older than 20 years, with a healthy oral mucosa and requiring implant surgery. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, history of implant failure, light sensitivity, metabolic deseases, consumption of antibiotics or corticosteroids in the last two weeks, smokers and alcohol drinkers. Patients reported the pain experienced by using a numeric rating scale (NRS) at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and from day 2 to 7. Swelling score was assessed by linear measurements and type and number of analgesic drugs within each time-point were recorded on a spreadsheet. Data of pain and amount of swelling were compared among the three groups by using the Kruskal-Wallis H Test and post-hoc comparisons tests. Results Pain in the experimental group was less compared to controls and placebo group, at each time intervals (p < 0.001) as well as the maximum pain score (experimental group: median = 2, interquartile range 2-3; control group: median = 8, interquartile range 3,75-9; placebo group: median = 8, interquartile range 6,25-9). Swelling was almost insignificant in the experimental group (maximum value = 1, interquartile range 0-2,75, at 24 hours) compared with control (maximum value = 6, interquartile range 5-8,75, at 24 hours) and placebo (maximum value = 6, interquartile range 5-8, at 24 hours). Subjects in the experimental group assumed less analgesics compared to both controls and placebo groups. Conclusions Photobiostimulation is an effective method to reduce pain intensity/duration and swelling after implant surgery. Key words:LLLT, photobiostimulation, pain, implant surgery.

10.4317/medoral.23336https://hdl.handle.net/10550/77110