6533b837fe1ef96bd12a2865

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparative assessment of a foam-based oxidative treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated unsaturated and anisotropic soils.

Iheb BouzidJulien MaireNicolas Fatin-rouge

subject

Environmental EngineeringHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesis0208 environmental biotechnology02 engineering and technology010501 environmental sciences01 natural sciencesPermeabilitySoilSurface-Active AgentsPulmonary surfactantVadose zonemedicine[CHIM]Chemical SciencesEnvironmental ChemistrySoil PollutantsCoal tarComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSCoal TarEnvironmental Restoration and Remediation0105 earth and related environmental scienceschemistry.chemical_classification[SDE.IE]Environmental Sciences/Environmental EngineeringPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthWaterGeneral MedicineGeneral ChemistryContaminationPersulfateOxidantsPollution6. Clean waterHydrocarbons020801 environmental engineeringPermeability (earth sciences)Oxidative StressHydrocarbonchemistryChemical engineeringSoil waterAnisotropyEnvironmental PollutionOxidation-Reductionmedicine.drug

description

Abstract In situ delivery of liquid reagents in vadose zone is limited by soil anisotropy and gravity. The enhanced delivery of persulfate (PS) as oxidant, using a new foam-based method (F-PS) was compared at bench-scale to traditional water-based (W-PS) and surfactant solution-based (S-PS) deliveries. The goal was to distribute PS uniformly in coal tar-contaminated unsaturated and anisotropic soils, both in terms of permeability and contamination. Water was the less efficiently delivered fluid because of the hydrophobicity of the contaminated soils. Surfactant enhanced PS-distribution into contaminated zones by reducing interfacial tension and inverting soil wettability. Regardless of coal tar contamination contrasts (0 vs. 5 and 1 vs. 10 g kg soil−1) or strong permeability contrasts, PS-solution injection after foam injection led to the most uniform reagents delivery. While PS-concentration varied more than 5-times between zones using W-PS and S-PS methods, it varied less than 1.6-times when the F-PS one was used. Finally, despite unfavorable conditions, the foam-based method did not show any detrimental effect regarding the oxidation of hydrocarbons compared to the W-PS and S-PS methods carried out in ideal conditions. Moreover, hydrocarbon degradation rates were slightly higher when using F-PS than S-PS due to a lower surfactant content in the targeted zone.

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.295https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31195271