6533b838fe1ef96bd12a3d9f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Effects of femtosecond laser and other surface treatments on the bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets to zirconia.

Carlos Bellot-arcísVerónica García-sanzCarlos Doñate-buendíaOmel Mendoza-yeroJavier MonteroAlberto AlbaladejoVanessa Paredes-gallardo

subject

CeramicsScanning electron microscopeOrthodontic Bracketslcsh:MedicineTissue AdhesionsCoating Materials030207 dermatology & venereal diseases0302 clinical medicineMedicine and Health SciencesSilaneElectron MicroscopyCubic zirconiaCeramicZirconium oxideComposite materiallcsh:ScienceMicroscopyMultidisciplinaryBond strengthBracketTemperatureOptical EquipmentMetalsvisual_artPhysical SciencesFemtosecondvisual_art.visual_art_mediumEngineering and TechnologyScanning Electron MicroscopyShear StrengthResearch ArticleMaterials scienceMaterials by StructureMaterials ScienceOral MedicineEquipmentOrthodonticsResearch and Analysis MethodsENPEP gene03 medical and health sciencesCoatingsAdhesivesShear strengthMaterials by AttributeUniversal testing machineSurface TreatmentsLaserslcsh:R030206 dentistryManufacturing ProcessesMicroscopy Electron Scanninglcsh:QZirconium

description

Femtosecond laser has been proposed as a method for conditioning zirconia surfaces to boost bond strength. However, metallic or ceramic bracket bonding to femtosecond lasertreated zirconia surfaces has not been tested. This study compared the effects of four conditioning techniques, including femtosecond laser irradiation, on shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic and ceramic brackets to zirconia.Three hundred zirconia plates were divided into five groups: 1) control (C); 2) sandblasting (APA); 3) silica coating and silane (SC); 4) femtosecond laser (FS); 5) sandblasting followed by femtosecond laser (APA+SC). A thermal imaging camera measured temperature changes in the zirconia during irradiation. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (metallic vs ceramic brackets). SBS was evaluated using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was registered and surfaces were observed under SEM. Surface treatment and bracket type significantly affected the bracket-zirconia bond strength. SBS was significantly higher (p APA > FS > SC > control) than metallic brackets (APA+FS > FS > SC > APA > control). For metallic brackets, groups SC (5.99 ± 1.86 MPa), FS (6.72 ± 2.30 MPa) and APA+FS (7.22 ± 2.73 MPa) reported significantly higher bond strengths than other groups (p < 0.05). For ceramic brackets, the highest bond strength values were obtained in groups APA (25.01 ± 4.45 MPa), FS (23.18 ± 6.51 MPa) and APA+FS (29.22 ± 8.20 MPa).Femtosecond laser enhances bond strength of ceramic and metallic brackets to zirconia. Ceramic brackets provide significantly stronger adhesion than metallic brackets regardless of the surface treatment method.

10.1371/journal.pone.0186796http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5648233?pdf=render