6533b839fe1ef96bd12a5d34

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer resection: does the individual surgeon matter?

Alejandro EspíFranco G. MarinelloGloria BaguenaEduardo García-graneroElí LucasPedro EsclapezDavid HervásMatteo FrassonBlas Flor-lorente

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyBlood transfusionindividual surgeonColonColorectal cancermedicine.medical_treatmentAnastomotic Leak030230 surgeryAnastomosis03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineIleorectal anastomosisRisk FactorsTask Performance and AnalysisColon cancer resectionHumansAnastomotic leakMedicineBlood TransfusionRisk factorcolon resectionColectomyAgedRetrospective StudiesAged 80 and overbusiness.industryAnastomosis SurgicalGastroenterologyPerioperativeMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseSurgeryrisk factorcolon cancerElective Surgical ProceduresAnastomotic leakage030220 oncology & carcinogenesisColonic NeoplasmsFemaleClinical Competencebusiness

description

Aim Anastomotic leakage is one of the most feared complications after colonic resection. Many risk factors for anastomotic leakage have been reported, but the impact of an individual surgeon as a risk factor has scarcely been reported. The aim of this study was to assess if the individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage in colonic cancer surgery. Method This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent elective resection for colon cancer with anastomosis at a specialized colorectal unit from January 1993 to December 2010. Anastomotic leaks were diagnosed according to standardized criteria. Patient and tumour characteristics, surgical procedure and operating surgeons were analysed. A logistic regression model was used to discriminate statistical variation and identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Results A total of 1045 patients underwent elective colon cancer resection with primary anastomosis. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 6.4% of patients. Ileocolic anastomosis had an anastomotic leakage rate of 7.2%, colo-colonic/colorectal anastomosis 5.2% and ileorectal anastomosis 12.7%, with intersurgeon variability. The independent risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage were the use of perioperative blood transfusion (OR 2.83, CI 1.59–5.06, P < 0.0001) and the individual surgeon performing the procedure (OR up to 8.44, P < 0.0001). Conclusion In addition to perioperative blood transfusion, the individual surgeon was identified as an important risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Efforts should be made to reduce performance variability amongst surgeons.

https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13212