6533b83afe1ef96bd12a7007

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Physiological,anatomical and biomass partitioning responses to ozone in the Mediterranean endemic plant Lamottea dianae

Vicent CalatayudMaría José SanzJosé Reig-armiñanaJúlia CerveróFrancisco J. García-breijoFrancisco J. García-breijo

subject

Plant water useChlorophyllPhotoinhibitionEndemic plantsRubiscoSouthern EuropeChloroplastsPerennial plantPhysiological processHealth Toxicology and MutagenesisEnvironmental stressAsteraceaeEnvironmental protectionPlant RootsEnvironmental impactchemistry.chemical_compoundAnatomical variationIn vivo studyPhysiological responseBiomassPhotosynthesisBiomass partitioningBIOLOGIA VEGETALfood and beveragesGeneral MedicinePollutionPollenBiomass partitioningAnatomyStomatal conductanceCarbon dioxide fixationBOTANICAStomatal conductanceBiologyPhloemPhotosynthesisArticleAdverse outcomeOzoneLamottea dianaeBiomass allocationBotanyPhotoinhibitionSpecies conservationCalloseRuBisCOPlant damagePublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthWater use efficiencyPlant exudatePlantNonhumanPlant LeaveschemistryCarbon dioxideOxidative stressSpainbiology.proteinDegenerationPhloemEndemic speciesRisk factorControlled study

description

Ozone effects on the perennial forb Lamottea dianae were studied in an open-top chamber experiment. Ozone was found to induce reductions in CO 2 assimilation and water use efficiency in the leaves of this species. These reductions were mainly related to a decline in the in vivo CO 2 fixation capacity of Rubisco (V c,max), rather than to stomatal limitations or photoinhibitory damage (F v:F m). In addition to chloroplast degeneration, other observed effects were callose accumulation, formation of pectinaceous wart-like cell wall exudates and phloem alterations. Moreover, ozone exposure significantly reduced root dry biomass. The possible relevance of these adverse effects for Mediterranean forbs is commented. These results show that endemic plants can be very sensitive to ozone, suggesting that risks associated with this pollutant should be taken into account for conservation purposes. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.02.023http://hdl.handle.net/10251/60268