6533b851fe1ef96bd12a98f6
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Use of Expert Consensus to Improve Atherogenic Dyslipidemia Management
Antonio Hernández-mijaresRafael SimóJuan Pedro-botetTeresa Mantilla-moratóÁNgel Brea-hernandoÁNgel Díaz-rodríguezXavier Pintó SalaPedro González-santosJesús Millán Núñez-cortéssubject
medicine.medical_specialtyConsensusDelphi TechniqueGuidelines as TopicScientific evidenceTherapeutic approachRisk FactorsMultidisciplinary approachEpidemiologymedicineHumansRisk factorDyslipidemiascomputer.programming_languageAtherogenic dyslipidemiaEvidence-Based Medicinebusiness.industryExpert consensusGeneral MedicineAtherosclerosisAtherogenic dyslipidemia Cardiovascular risk Consenso Consensus Delphi Dislipemia aterogénica HDL-C LDL-C Riesgo cardiovascular high-density lipoprotein cholesterol low-density lipoprotein cholesterolCardiovascular DiseasesFamily medicinePhysical therapybusinesscomputerDelphidescription
Abstract Introduction and objectives Although atherogenic dyslipidemia is a recognized cardiovascular risk factor, it is often underassessed and thus undertreated and poorly controlled in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to reach a multidisciplinary consensus for the establishment of a set of clinical recommendations on atherogenic dyslipidemia to optimize its prevention, early detection, diagnostic evaluation, therapeutic approach, and follow-up. Methods After a review of the scientific evidence, a scientific committee formulated 87 recommendations related to atherogenic dyslipidemia, which were grouped into 5 subject areas: general concepts (10 items), impact and epidemiology (4 items), cardiovascular risk (32 items), detection and diagnosis (19 items), and treatment (22 items). A 2-round modified Delphi method was conducted to compare the opinions of a panel of 65 specialists in cardiology (23%), endocrinology (24.6%), family medicine (27.7%), and internal medicine (24.6%) on these issues. Results After the first round, the panel reached consensus on 65 of the 87 items discussed, and agreed on 76 items by the end of the second round. Insufficient consensus was reached on 3 items related to the detection and diagnosis of atherogenic dyslipidemia and 3 items related to the therapeutic goals to be achieved in these patients. Conclusions The external assessment conducted by experts on atherogenic dyslipidemia showed a high level of professional agreement with the proposed clinical recommendations. These recommendations represent a useful tool for improving the clinical management of patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia. A detailed analysis of the current scientific evidence is required for those statements that eluded consensus.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013-03-19 | Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) |