6533b852fe1ef96bd12ab784
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale scores:An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies
Bernd LöweRoy C. ZiegelsteinAlasdair G RooneyAlasdair G RooneyIstván TiringerIoannis MichopoulosYin WuMahrukh ImranLuigi GrassiMatthew J. ChiovittiVesile Senturk CankorurAntônio Lúcio TeixeiraMarleine AzarNatalie Büel-drabeRonan M. ConroyDana WongDana WongDean McmillanBrooke LevisWim L. LoosmanMichael SharpeRocío Martín-santosMarie KjærgaardXin Wei YanEli DabscheckElles DouvenAdomas BuneviciusAdomas BuneviciusPim CuijpersCarmen G. LoiselleLesley StaffordJosef JeneweinIan ShrierJ. PeceliunieneFederico M. DarayJill BoruffLuis PintorCarlos Eduardo Da Rocha E SilvaKerrie CloverRoberto Sánchez-gonzálezZahinoor IsmailZahinoor IsmailNazanin SaadatAnna BeraldiSebastian KöhlerMeaghan O'donnellFelix FischerLaurent MiseryChen HeMarina DowningLoreto MassardoSébastien SimardMark WalterfangScott B. PattenBrett D. ThombsJennifer WhiteAhmet OzturkChih Ken ChenLiang-jen WangKira E. RiehmKira E. RiehmPamela GallagherRicard NavinésJon StoneTerence J. QuinnGary CheungSilje Endresen RemeAnna P. B. M. BraekenAnna P. B. M. BraekenAndrea BenedettiJane WalkerAlastair J. FlintDaniel CukorMarcelo Liborio SchwarzboldParash Mani BhandariMarcello TonelliSung Wan KimDanielle B. RiceJennie PonsfordMartin HärterMaiko FujimoriJae-min KimDipika NeupaneJohn P. A. IoannidisNicholas D. MitchellNicholas D. MitchellAnthony FeinsteinLorie A. KlodaGregory CarterSamir Al-adawiMilena GandySimon GilbodyPanagiotis FerentinosPanagiotis FerentinosMiguel JuliãoJuwita ShaabanYing SunAlyna TurnerAlyna TurnerAlyna TurnerKatrin ReuterAnkur KrishnanAnja MehnertSimone GoebelMelissa HenryYutaka MatsuokaLouise SharpeSusanne SingerSerge SultanNathalie Jettesubject
MaleDepressive disordersSCHEDULESACCURACYSocio-culturaleHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleOdds03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingIndividual participant data meta-analysisMedicineHumansMajor depression030212 general & internal medicineVALIDITYDepression (differential diagnoses)Mini-international neuropsychiatric interviewProbabilityPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesDepressive Disorder MajorDepressive disorders Diagnostic interviews Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Individual participant data meta-analysis Major depressionbusiness.industryIndividual participant dataOdds ratioCIDIAn individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies.- Journal of psychosomatic research cilt.129 ss.109892 2020 [Wu Y. Levis B. Sun Y. Krishnan A. He C. Riehm K. Rice D. Azar M. Yan X. Neupane D. et al. -Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale scores]3. Good healthPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleMeta-analysisDiagnostic interviews/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_beingFemalebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryClinical psychologydescription
Objective Two previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) found that different diagnostic interviews classify different proportions of people as having major depression overall or by symptom levels. We compared the odds of major depression classification across diagnostic interviews among studies that administered the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Methods Data accrued for an IPDMA on HADS-D diagnostic accuracy were analysed. We fit binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare odds of major depression classification for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), controlling for HADS-D scores and participant characteristics with and without an interaction term between interview and HADS-D scores. Results There were 15,856 participants (1942 [12%] with major depression) from 73 studies, including 15,335 (97%) non-psychiatric medical patients, 164 (1%) partners of medical patients, and 357 (2%) healthy adults. The MINI (27 studies, 7345 participants, 1066 major depression cases) classified participants as having major depression more often than the CIDI (10 studies, 3023 participants, 269 cases) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70 (0.84, 3.43)) and the semi-structured SCID (36 studies, 5488 participants, 607 cases) (aOR = 1.52 (1.01, 2.30)). The odds ratio for major depression classification with the CIDI was less likely to increase as HADS-D scores increased than for the SCID (interaction aOR = 0.92 (0.88, 0.96)). Conclusion Compared to the SCID, the MINI may diagnose more participants as having major depression, and the CIDI may be less responsive to symptom severity.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-01 |