6533b853fe1ef96bd12acc62

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparative study of three satellite image time-series decomposition methods for vegetation change detection

Oumayma BounouhRogier De JongBeatriz MartínezImed Riadh FarahImed Riadh FarahAli Ben Abbes

subject

Atmospheric ScienceNon-stationary010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesBFASTSTL0211 other engineering and technologiesMRA-WT02 engineering and technology01 natural sciencesNormalized Difference Vegetation Indexlcsh:OceanographyDecomposition (computer science)medicineSatellite imagerylcsh:GC1-1581Computers in Earth SciencesNDVI time series021101 geological & geomatics engineering0105 earth and related environmental sciencesGeneral Environmental ScienceRemote sensingApplied Mathematicslcsh:QE1-996.5Global change15. Life on landSeasonalitymedicine.diseaselcsh:GeologyEnvironmental scienceChange detectionSatellite Image Time Seriesmedicine.symptomVegetation (pathology)[SPI.SIGNAL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processingChange detection

description

International audience; Satellite image time-series (SITS) methods have contributed notably to detection of global change over the last decades, for instance by tracking vegetation changes. Compared with multi-temporal change detection methods, temporally highly resolved SITS methods provide more information in a single analysis, for instance on the type and consistency of change. In particular, SITS decomposition methods show a great potential in extracting various components from non-stationary time series, which allows for an improved interpretation of the temporal variability. Even though many case studies have applied SITS decomposition methods, a systematic comparison of common algorithms is still missing. In this study, the seasonal trend loess (STL), breaks for additive season and trend (BFAST) and multi-resolution analysis-wavelet transform (MRA-WT) were explored in order to evaluate their performance in modelling, monitoring and detecting land-cover changes with pronounced seasonal variations from simulated normal difference vegetation index time series. The selected methods have all proven their ability to characterize the non-stationary vegetation dynamics along with different physical processes driving the vegetation dynamics. Our results indicated that BFAST is the most accurate method for the examined simulated dataset in terms of RMSE, whereas MRA-WT showed a great potential for the extraction of multi-level vegetation dynamics. Considering the computational efficiency, both STL and MRA-WT outperformed BFAST.

10.1080/22797254.2018.1465360https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01958381