6533b853fe1ef96bd12accb5

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Traction test of temporary dental cements

Rubén Agustín-panaderoAntonio Fons-fontDiego Millan-martínezJuan-luis Román-rodríguezLucía Fernández-estevan

subject

musculoskeletal diseasesMolarMaterials sciencemedicine.medical_treatmentResin restorationsDentistry02 engineering and technology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineDental cementmedicineIn vitro studyGeneral DentistryProsthetic Dentistrybusiness.industryResearchtechnology industry and agriculture030206 dentistryTraction (orthopedics):CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]equipment and supplies021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologysurgical procedures operativeUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS0210 nano-technologybusiness

description

Background Classic self-curing temporary cements obstruct the translucence of provisional restorations. New dual-cure esthetic temporary cements need investigation and comparison with classic cements to ensure that they are equally retentive and provide adequate translucence. The objective is to analyze by means of traction testing in a in vitro study the retention of five temporary cements. Material and methods Ten molars were prepared and ten provisional resin restorations were fabricated using CAD-CAM technology (n=10). Five temporary cements were selected: self-curing temporary cements, Dycal (D), Temp Bond (TB), Temp Bond Non Eugenol (TBNE); dual-curing esthetic cements Temp Bond Clear (TBC) and Telio CS link (TE). Each sample underwent traction testing, both with thermocycling (190 cycles at 5-55o) and without thermocycling. Results TE and TBC obtained the highest traction resistance values. Thermocycling reduced the resistance of all cements except TBC. Conclusions The dual-cure esthetic cements tested provided optimum outcomes for bonding provisional restorations. Key words:Temporary dental cements, cements resistance.

yearjournalcountryeditionlanguage
2017-04-01Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53732