6533b853fe1ef96bd12acd52

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Nasal IgE in subjects with allergic and non-allergic rhinitis

Anna FischlJulia HinkelGabriele HoltappelsEva HerrmannStefan ZielenJonas EckrichClaus Bachert

subject

AllergyNon-allergic rhinitismedicine.medical_treatmentImmunoglobulin EAR + HDM allergic rhinitis with house dust mite allergyAllergic rhinitisHDM house dust miteNPT nasal provocation testsAR allergic rhinitis0302 clinical medicineISAAC International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaireNARES non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilia-syndromeMedicine and Health SciencesImmunology and Allergy030223 otorhinolaryngologyeducation.field_of_studybiologymedicine.diagnostic_testRadioallergosorbent testsIgE allergen-specific IgENon-allergicD1 Dermatophagoides pteronyssinusPREVALENCED2 Dermatophagoides farinaeLAR local allergic rhinitisPROVOCATION TESTSPulmonary and Respiratory Medicinelcsh:Immunologic diseases. AllergyLOCAL IGEImmunologyPopulationPATHOPHYSIOLOGYNon-allergic-rhinitisLocal allergic rhinitisGCP Good Clinical PracticeDIAGNOSISNasal provocation testArticleSECRETIONS03 medical and health sciencesFEV1/FVC ratiorhinitismedicineddc:610educationHouse dust mitebusiness.industryFEV1 forced expiratory volume in one secondRAST Radioallergosorbent Testbiology.organism_classificationmedicine.disease030228 respiratory systemHouse dust mite allergyPNIF peak nasal inspiratory flowImmunologyFVC forced vital capacitybiology.proteinbusinessSD standard deviationlcsh:RC581-607Local IgESPT skin prick test

description

Abstract Purpose The prevalence of "ocal allergic rhinitis" within individuals suffering from perennial rhinitis remains uncertain, and patients usually are diagnosed with non-allergic rhinitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of a potential "local allergic rhinitis" in subjects suffering from non-allergic rhinitis in a non-selected group of young students. Methods 131 students (age 25.0 ± 5.1 years) with a possible allergic rhinitis and 25 non-allergic controls without rhinitis symptoms (age 22.0 ± 2.0 years) were recruited by public postings. 97 of 131 students with rhinitis were tested positive (≥3 mm) to prick testing with 17 frequent allergens at visit 1. Twenty-four 24 subjects with a house dust mite allergy, 21 subjects with a non-allergic rhinitis, and 18 non-allergic controls were further investigated at visit 2. Blood samples were taken, and nasal secretion was examined. In addition, all groups performed a nasal provocation test with house dust mite (HDM). Results In serum and nasal secretion, total IgE and house dust mite specific IgE significantly differed between HDM positive subjects and controls. However, no differences between non-allergic subjects and control subjects were quantifiable. Neither a nasal provocation test nor a nasal IgE to HDM allergens showed a measurable positive response in any of the non-allergic rhinitis subjects as well as the healthy controls, whilst being positive in 13 subjects with HDM allergy. Conclusions Nasal IgE is present in subjects with HDM allergy, but not in non-allergic rhinitis. In the investigated non-selected population, exclusive local production of IgE is absent. By implication, therefore, our findings challenge the emerging concept of local allergic rhinitis. Study identifier at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 02810535.

10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100129http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455120300326