6533b854fe1ef96bd12adf31

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study of oral seletalisib in primary Sjögren’s syndrome

Maria JuarezSaba NayarPayne Andrew CharlesWan-fai NgNieves DiazJuan Sanchez BursonDionne CainPaulette WilliamsMarika KvarnströmBenjamin A FisherBenjamin A FisherValérie Devauchelle-pensecJosé RosasGiovanni TrioloSimon J. BowmanXavier MarietteJacques-eric GottenbergGiuliana GugginoRoberto GiacomelliFrancesca BaroneGeoffrey I JohnstonEric Helmer

subject

Male0301 basic medicineSalivamedicine.medical_specialtyPyridinesprimary Sjögren’s syndromeAdministration Oralprimary Sjogren's syndromePlaceboProof of Concept StudyGastroenterologySalivary Glandshistologyseletalisib03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineDouble-Blind MethodRheumatologyInternal medicineproof-of-conceptmedicineHumansPharmacology (medical)Adverse effect030203 arthritis & rheumatologySalivary glandbiologySurrogate endpointbusiness.industryMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseSialadenitisphosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta (PI3K delta)primary Sjögren's syndrome3. Good healthSjogren's Syndrome030104 developmental biologymedicine.anatomical_structureTolerabilityImmunoglobulin MAntirheumatic Agentsphosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ)Quinolinesbiology.protein[SDV.IMM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/ImmunologyFemalebusiness

description

Abstract Objectives This phase 2 proof-of-concept study (NCT02610543) assessed efficacy, safety and effects on salivary gland inflammation of seletalisib, a potent and selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe primary Sjögren’s syndrome (PSS). Methods Adults with PSS were randomized 1:1 to seletalisib 45 mg/day or placebo, in addition to current PSS therapy. Primary end points were safety and tolerability and change from baseline in EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) score at week 12. Secondary end points included change from baseline at week 12 in EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) score and histological features in salivary gland biopsies. Results Twenty-seven patients were randomized (seletalisib n = 13, placebo n = 14); 20 completed the study. Enrolment challenges led to early study termination with loss of statistical power (36% vs 80% planned). Nonetheless, a trend for improvement in ESSDAI and ESSPRI [difference vs placebo: –2.59 (95% CI: –7.30, 2.11; P=0.266) and –1.55 (95% CI: –3.39, 0.28), respectively] was observed at week 12. No significant changes were seen in saliva and tear flow. Serious adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3/13 of patients receiving seletalisib vs 1/14 for placebo and 5/13 vs 1/14 discontinued due to AEs, respectively. Serum IgM and IgG concentrations decreased in the seletalisib group vs placebo. Seletalisib demonstrated efficacy in reducing size and organisation of salivary gland inflammatory foci and in target engagement, thus reducing PI3K-mTOR signalling compared with placebo. Conclusion Despite enrolment challenges, seletalisib demonstrated a trend towards clinical improvement in patients with PSS. Histological analyses demonstrated encouraging effects of seletalisib on salivary gland inflammation and organisation. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02610543.

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa410https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03113993