6533b854fe1ef96bd12ae144
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Optimal decongestive therapy in acute decompensated heart failure syndromes: Far from being solved
Eduardo NúñezVicent BodíJuan SanchisJulio NúñezAntoni Bayes-genissubject
Malemedicine.medical_specialtyCardiotonic AgentsAcute decompensated heart failuremedicine.drug_classDopamineFurosemideDopamineInternal medicinemedicineHumansDiureticsBeneficial effectsHeart Failurebusiness.industryOptimal treatmentLow doseFurosemideLoop diureticmedicine.diseaseClinical trialCardiologyFemaleCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicinebusinessmedicine.drugdescription
We have read with great interest the article entitled “Efficacy and safety of high dose versus low dose furosemide with or without dopamine infusion: The Dopamine in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure II (DAD-HF II) Trial” [1]. First, we would like to commend the authors for their effort in carrying out this investigator-initiated clinical trial by testing the prognostic effect of three decongestive strategies in the management of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The analysis of the data revealed no-significant differences in the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes between high (HDF) vs low-dose furosemide infusion (LDFD); the addition of low-dose dopamine infusion to LDFD-groupwas not associatedwith any beneficial effects. Not infrequently, trials comparing different decongestive modalities in ADHF have produced negative results [2–4] leading to a great uncertainty about the optimal treatment in ADHF syndromes.Wewould like to highlight some potential explanations for these and other recent findings and also, exert caution in their interpretation.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014-03-24 | International Journal of Cardiology |