6533b854fe1ef96bd12af674

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Prevention of eating disorders-Efficacy and cost-benefit of a school-based program ("MaiStep") in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Verena ErnstVanessa WolterArne BuergerFlorian Hammerle

subject

medicine.medical_specialtySchoolsAdolescentbusiness.industryBulimia nervosaCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care Costsmedicine.diseaseDSM-5law.inventionClinical trialFeeding and Eating DisordersPsychiatry and Mental healthEating disordersRandomized controlled triallawIntervention (counseling)Relative riskHealth carePhysical therapyMedicineHumansbusinessStudents

description

Objective Given the severity of eating disorders, effective and easily implementable prevention programs which reduce incidence rates and in addition have health-economic benefits are essential. The majority of research on prevention programs focuses on questionnaire-based efficacy or the reduction of eating disorder symptoms while neglecting the health-economic perspective. By contrast, the present study focuses on both an efficacy analysis considering diagnostic criteria (DSM-5) and on evaluating the cost-benefit of a universal prevention program for eating disorders ("MaiStep"). Method A three-arm randomized controlled trial with baseline, posttreatment and 12-month follow-up was conducted with 1,654 adolescents (M = 13.35, SD = 0.76), comprising two intervention groups (MaiStep delivered by psychologists or teachers, IG-T) and an active control group (ACG). The primary outcome was DSM-5 eating disorder diagnosis measured with the SIAB-S. Furthermore, the costs of the prevention program and the savings in health care costs were calculated. Results A significant difference in eating disorder diagnosis was found between the IG-T and the ACG for posttreatment (χ2 (1= 7.352, p = .007), Relative Risk (RR) = .53 and 12-month follow-up (χ2 (1= 5.203, p = .023), RR = .61. MaiStep proved to be cost-effective (tcbr = 6.75), saving about 560,000 € (standardized per 1,000 students = 601,388.19 €). Discussion Universal prevention can both reduce incidence rates of eating disorders and be cost-beneficial for health care systems. Future research should analyze prevention programs regarding efficacy and cost-benefit to enable comparability and derive guidelines for political decision-makers. Trial registration number MaiStep is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00005050).

10.1002/eat.23599https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34498304