6533b857fe1ef96bd12b39d9
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Validity and fairness of a new entry diagnostics test in higher education economics
Olga Zlatkin-troitschanskaiaSebastian BrücknerJasmin SchlaxJudith JitomirskiManuel FörsterCarla Kühling-theesRoland HappHans Anand Pantsubject
050101 languages & linguisticsHigher educationbusiness.industryFirst language05 social sciences050301 educationlanguage.human_languageEducationTest (assessment)DisadvantagedGermanGroup differencesMathematics educationlanguage0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesKnowledge testbusinessPsychology0503 educationCoding (social sciences)description
Abstract Research has been focusing increasingly on measuring students’ prior economic knowledge in higher education. However, in German-speaking countries, valid instruments are rare. A diagnostic study investigated the validity and fairness of an internationally established economic knowledge test (adapted German version of TUCE IV and TEL IV) with a representative sample of 7664 students from 46 universities across Germany. Previous findings with the dataset ( Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia et al., 2019a ) suggest that native language significantly predicts missing answers in the knowledge test. Similar effects can be found for gender. After coding missing answers as incorrect, students with a native language other than German and females are disadvantaged. Using multiple imputation, group differences are still significant but to a lesser extent. This approach is critically discussed in terms of valid diagnostics and assessment in higher education.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-09-01 | Studies in Educational Evaluation |