6533b857fe1ef96bd12b451f
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Biomarker discovery study of inflammatory proteins for colorectal cancer early detection demonstrated importance of screening setting validation
Kaja TikkJing QianYesilda BalavarcaSimone WernerHermann BrennerMaral SaadatiMarlene Hechtnersubject
AdultMale0301 basic medicineOncologymedicine.medical_specialtyEpidemiologyColorectal cancerEarly detectionSensitivity and Specificity03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicineBiomarkers TumorHumansMedicineProspective StudiesBiomarker discoveryEarly Detection of CancerAgedAged 80 and overTraining setColorectal cancer early detectionbusiness.industryMiddle AgedCancer Early Detectionmedicine.diseaseInflammatory biomarkers030104 developmental biologyArea Under Curve030220 oncology & carcinogenesisBiomarker (medicine)FemaleColorectal NeoplasmsbusinessAlgorithmsdescription
Abstract Objectives Most studies identifying inflammatory markers for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) were conducted using clinically manifest cases. We aimed to identify circulating inflammatory biomarkers for early detection of CRC and validate them in both a clinical setting and a true screening setting. Study Design and Setting A total of 92 inflammatory proteins were quantified in baseline plasma samples from individuals clinically diagnosed with CRC and neoplasm-free controls matched on age and sex (training set). A multimarker panel was selected and evaluated in samples from another clinical setting (validation set C) and a screening setting (validation set S). Results In the training set (N = 330), a five-biomarker signature was selected that provided an area under curve (AUC) of 0.85 and 60.9% sensitivity to detect CRC at 90% specificity. When this algorithm was applied to validation set C (N = 318), the AUC (0.80) and sensitivity (49.5%) at 90% specificity for CRC diagnosis were only slightly lower than those in the training set. By contrast, the diagnostic performance of the algorithm in validation set S (N = 126) from a true screening setting was much poorer, with an AUC of 0.59 and a sensitivity of 28.6% at 90% specificity. Conclusions An inflammation-related protein panel with apparently good diagnostic properties for CRC detection was identified and confirmed in an independent clinical validation set. However, the biomarker combination performed substantially worse in a validation sample from a true screening setting. Our results underline the importance of validation in screening settings subsequently to novel signature discovery for cancer early detection.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-12-01 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |