6533b858fe1ef96bd12b6425

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Repetition suppression versus enhancement — it's quantity that matters

Lucia MelloniM. ScholzNotger G. MüllerHendrik StrumpfBernhard Baier

subject

AdultMalephysiology [Recognition Psychology]genetic structuresAdolescentCognitive NeuroscienceStimulus (physiology)Brain mappingCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceYoung Adultphysiology [Brain]medicineHumansChromatin structure remodeling (RSC) complexddc:610Bold responseMathematicsCommunicationBrain MappingBlood-oxygen-level dependentbiologymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryBrainRecognition PsychologyMagnetic Resonance Imagingbiology.proteinTransverse occipital sulcusFemalebusinessFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeurosciencePhotic Stimulation

description

Upon repetition, certain stimuli induce reduced neural responses (i.e., repetition suppression), whereas others evoke stronger signals (i.e., repetition enhancement). It has been hypothesized that stimulus properties (e.g., visibility) determine the direction of the repetition effect. Here, we show that the very same stimuli can induce both repetition suppression and enhancement, whereby the only determining factor is the number of repetitions. Repeating the same, initially novel low-visible pictures of scenes for up to 5 times enhanced the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response in scene-selective areas, that is, the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and the transverse occipital sulcus (TOS), presumably reflecting the strengthening of the internal representation. Additional repetitions (6-9) resulted in progressively attenuated neural responses indicating a more efficient representation of the now familiar stimulus. Behaviorally, repetition led to increasingly faster responses and higher visibility ratings. Novel scenes induced the largest BOLD response in the PPA and also higher activity in yet another scene-selective region, the retrospenial cortex (RSC). We propose that 2 separable processes modulate activity in the PPA: one process optimizes the internal stimulus representation and involves TOS and the other differentiates between familiar and novel scenes and involves RSC.

10.1093/cercor/bhs009https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000B-6160-B21.11116/0000-000B-615E-F