6533b859fe1ef96bd12b6ea4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Biomechanical testing of different posterior fusion devices on lumbar spinal range of motion.

Thomas NusseltErol GercekPol Maria RommensGerrit Steffen MaierFrank Hartmann

subject

musculoskeletal diseasesFacet (geometry)Materials scienceRotationBiophysics03 medical and health sciencesFixation (surgical)0302 clinical medicineLumbarCadaverBone platemedicineCadaverHumansOrthopedics and Sports MedicineRange of Motion ArticularLumbar VertebraeBiomechanicsLumbosacral RegionLumbar spinal stenosis030229 sport sciencesmusculoskeletal systemmedicine.diseaseBiomechanical PhenomenaSpinal FusionRange of motionBone Plates030217 neurology & neurosurgeryBiomedical engineering

description

Abstract Background Recent minimal-invasive posterior fusion devices are supposed to provide stability and obtain fusion in combination with interbody cages in the instrumented segment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the primary stability of two minimal-invasive posterior prototypes compared to an established spinous process plate and standard pedicle screw instrumentation. Methods Seven fresh frozen human cadaver lumbar spines (L2–L5) were tested in a spinal testing device with a moment of 7.5 Nm. Spinal stability was determined as mean range of motion (RoM) in the segment L3/L4 during extension-flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation. The RoM was measured during five conditions: 1. intact; 2. working prototype composed of an interspinous device and process plates; 3. an established spinous process fixation device 4. working prototype of facet fixation and 5. pedicle screw fixation. Findings All devices caused a significant reduction of RoM during extension-flexion. The RoM during lateral bending was significantly reduced to 37% (of intact) by pedicle screws and 68% by facet fixation prototype. During axial rotation the RoM was significantly reduced to 52% by pedicle screws and to 86% by facet fixation prototype. The other devices had no significant influence on RoM during lateral bending and axial rotation. Interpretation The facet fixation prototype provided less primary stability compared to pedicle screws, but had significant advantages over spinous process fixation techniques. The results encourage further testing of this implant as a minimal-invasive approach for posterior fixation.

10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.01.012https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30738222