6533b85afe1ef96bd12b96be

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Muscle activation during push-ups performed under stable and unstable conditions

Juan C. ColadoDiego Moya-nájeraN. Travis TriplettSebastien BorreaniFernando MartinJoaquin Calatayud

subject

Orthodonticslcsh:SportsCore (anatomy)medicine.medical_specialtyPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthPharmaceutical ScienceInstabilityPharmacology (nursing)Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationMuscle activationIsometric exerciseMetronomelaw.inventionlcsh:GV557-1198.995LumbarEMGPush-uplawAnterior deltoidPhysical therapymedicineOriginal ArticleCoreYoung maleMathematics

description

Background/Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze muscle activation when performing push-ups under different stability conditions. Methods: Physically fit young male university students (N = 30) performed five push-ups under stable conditions (on the floor) and using four unstable devices (wobble board, stability disc, fitness dome, and the TRX Suspension Trainer). The push-up speed was controlled using a metronome, and the testing order was randomized. The average amplitudes of the electromyographic (EMG) root mean square of the anterior deltoid (DELT), serratus anterior (SERRA), lumbar multifidus (LUMB), and rectus femoris (FEM) were recorded. The electromyographic signals were normalized to the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Results: No significant differences were found for the DELT [F(4,112) = 1.978; p = 0.130] among the conditions. However, statistically significant differences were found among the different conditions for the SERRA [F(4,60) = 17.649; p < 0.001], LUMB [F(4,76) = 12.334; p < 0.001], and FEM [F(4,104) = 24.676; p < 0.001] muscle activation. The suspended device was the only condition that elicited higher LUMB and FEM activation compared to the other conditions. Push-ups performed on the floor showed lower SERRA activation than those performed with all unstable devices. Conclusion: Not all unstable devices enhance muscle activation compared to traditional push-ups.

10.1016/j.jesf.2015.07.002http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X1500026X