6533b85cfe1ef96bd12bd1bf

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Mitigation and boosting as face-protection functions

Gloria Uclés Ramada

subject

050101 languages & linguisticsLinguistics and LanguageBoosting (doping)business.industryComputer science05 social sciencesSocial impactcomputer.software_genre050105 experimental psychologyLanguage and LinguisticsArtificial IntelligencePhenomenon0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesArtificial intelligencebusinessReality televisioncomputerNatural language processingUtterance

description

Abstract Mitigation is undeniably and necessarily linked with the social aspect of communication. No speaker mitigates an utterance without a goal in mind, which makes mitigation a means to an end and not an end in itself. Even though the various definitions of mitigation do not assign the same aims to this phenomenon, the social impact it has on the participants in the communication is generally agreed upon throughout the literature (Fraser, 1980; Meyer-Hermann, 1988; Bazzanella et al., 1991; Briz, 1998, 2003; Caffi, 1999; Thaler, 2012; Briz and Albelda, 2013; Schneider, 2013; Albelda et al., 2014; Albelda, 2016, 2018). In this paper, the mitigating and boosting strategies in relationship with face-protection are analysed in a self-compiled corpus containing the transcriptions of the Spanish reality television show Gandia Shore. The results demonstrate that the aforementioned mitigating functions do not belong exclusively to the domain of mitigation, but they can also be performed using boosting. The findings suggest that the functions associated with mitigation in previous studies are, in fact, the face-protection functions, which thus constitutes a broader and hierarchically higher category.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.017