6533b85efe1ef96bd12bfb77
RESEARCH PRODUCT
false
Vicente Raga Rosalenysubject
Cultural StudiesSociology and Political ScienceArgumentGeneral Arts and HumanitiesIdentity (philosophy)media_common.quotation_subjectMoral responsibilitySociologynobodyEpistemologymedia_commonSkepticismdescription
The Strawson´s Basic Argument is the stronger against moral responsibility in Philosophy of action. One should be responsible of his identity to be moral responsible of his actions, but then nobody could be never responsible. In this article I criticize orthodox solutions to Strawson´s sceptical challenge and show how they share with the Argument the same theological notion of monadical agent. A new solution needs a new conception of agent..
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-04-30 | Arbor |