6533b85efe1ef96bd12bfc49
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Assessing self-criticism and self-reassurance: Examining psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Short-Form of the Forms of Self-Criticizing/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS-SF) in Spanish sample.
Joaquim SolerAusiàs CebollaJaime NavarreteRosa M. BañosElisabet Domínguez-clavéRocío Herrerosubject
MaleSelf-AssessmentMindfulnessPsychometricsEating DisordersTest StatisticsSocial SciencesMathematical and Statistical TechniquesMedicine and Health SciencesPsychologyMeditationmedia_commonMeasurementMultidisciplinaryDepressionMultilevel modelStatisticsQRMiddle AgedDistressEating disordersScale (social sciences)Physical SciencesEngineering and TechnologyMedicineFemalePsychologyFactor AnalysisClinical psychologyResearch ArticleAdultSelf-criticismPsychometricsAdolescentmedia_common.quotation_subjectSciencePsychological StressResearch and Analysis MethodsYoung AdultMental Health and PsychiatrymedicineHumansStatistical MethodsAgedMood DisordersBiology and Life Sciencesmedicine.diseaseEmpathyFactor Analysis StatisticalMathematicsdescription
The Forms of Self-Criticizing/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) was designed to measure self-criticism (SC) through Inadequate Self (IS) and Hated Self (HS) factors, as well as self-reassurance (RS). However, its long and short forms have yet to be validated in the Spanish Population. The present study examines the psychometric properties of the short form (FSCRS-SF) and its clinical usefulness in a sample of 576 adult individuals, 77 with psychiatric disorders and 499 without. Non-clinical participants were split according to their previous experience with meditation (active meditators, n = 133; non-active meditators, n = 41; and non-meditators, n = 325) and differences between these subgroups were explored. Additionally, a subsample of 20 non-clinical participants took part in a mindfulness- and compassion- based intervention (MCBI) to assess the usefulness of the scale as an outcome measure. Results confirmed the original three-factorial structure, good internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reliability, and a pattern of correlations consistent with previous literature. Regarding differences between groups, the clinical subsample showed significant higher SC and lower RS levels than non-clinical participants and active meditators had significant lower IS and higher RS levels than non-meditators. Participants who participated in the MCBI showed significant RS improvement and a decrease in IS and HS levels. Moreover, a hierarchical multiple regression showed that RS made a significant predictive contribution to distress at three months’ time. In conclusion, results show that the Spanish version of the FSCRS-SF is a reliable and valid measure of SC and RS in non-clinical populations and an adequate instrument to detect changes after MCBIs.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-01-01 | PLoS ONE |