6533b85efe1ef96bd12bfcb8
RESEARCH PRODUCT
r‐Process Abundances and Chronometers in Metal‐poor Stars
David TytlerKarl KratzTimothy C. BeersScott BurlesScott BurlesFriedrich-karl ThielemannJohn J. CowanChristopher SnedenB. Pfeiffersubject
Physics010308 nuclear & particles physicsConjunction (astronomy)Astrophysics (astro-ph)FOS: Physical sciencesAstronomy and AstrophysicsAstrophysicsAstrophysics7. Clean energy01 natural sciencesGalaxyStars13. Climate actionSpace and Planetary ScienceNucleosynthesisGlobular cluster0103 physical sciencesr-processHalo010303 astronomy & astrophysicsRadioactive decaydescription
Rapid neutron-capture (i.e., r-process) nucleosynthesis calculations, employing internally consistent and physically realistic nuclear physics input (QRPA beta-decay rates and the ETFSI-Q nuclear mass model), have been made. These calculations are compared with ground-based and HST observations of neutron-capture elements in the metal poor halo stars CS 22892--052, HD 115444, HD 122563 and HD 126238. The elemental abundances in all four metal-poor stars are consistent with the solar r-process elemental distribution for the elements Z >/= 56. These results strongly suggest, at least for those elements, that the relative elemental r-process abundances have not changed over the history of the Galaxy. This further suggests that there is one r-process site in the Galaxy, at least for elements Z >/= 56. Employing the observed stellar abundances of stable elements, in conjunction with the solar r-process abundances to constrain the calculations, predictions for the zero decay-age abundances of the radioactive elements Th and U are made. We compare these (least-squares-fit ETFSI-Q) predictions with newly derived observational values in three very metal-poor halo stars: HD 115444, CS 22892--052 and HD 122563. Within the observational errors the observed ratio of [Th/Eu] is the same in both CS 22892--052 and HD 115444. Comparing with the theoretical ratio suggests an average age of these two very metal poor stars to be approximately 15.6 +/- 4.6 Gyr, consistent with earlier radioactive age estimates and recent globular and cosmological age estimates.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
1998-08-24 | The Astrophysical Journal |