6533b85ffe1ef96bd12c11b6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Clinical effect of diode laser on peri-implant tissues during non-surgical peri-implant mucositis therapy: Randomized controlled clinical study

Santiago Arias-herreraJosé-maría Díaz-fernándezRebeca Sánchez-martosKheira Bouazza-juanesAndrea Samman

subject

0301 basic medicine030103 biophysicsPeri-implant mucositisBleeding on probingDentistryOdontología03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineLáseresStatistical significanceAdjuvant therapymedicineMucositisTecnología médicaGeneral DentistryImplantes dentalesbusiness.industryResearch030206 dentistrymedicine.disease:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Clinical trialUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASAnalysis of varianceImplantmedicine.symptomOral Surgerybusiness

description

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the response to the non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis using the diode laser as an adjuvant therapy in patients with implant-supported restorations, in terms of clinical variables, with respect to those patients in whom conventional non-surgical therapy is used. Material and Methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial with simple blind 3 months follow-up. Two groups of patients were established, the non-surgical mechanical debridement of the affected implants was performed in the control group (n = 34) and the diode laser therapy was also performed in the test group (n = 34). The implant was considered the study subject; the variables considered were plaque index, bleeding on probing depth, depth of probing and recession of the peri-implant mucosa. The t-Student test was used to establish the intergroup statistical differences and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to measures intragroup differences over time. Results: In the revaluation at 6 weeks, we observed statistically significant differences (p <0.05) between the variables of plaque index and depth of probing between both groups. The test group obtained an average of 0.248 ± 0.3155 in plaque index and 0.833 ± 0.374mm in the depth of probing compared to the results obtained in the control group that was 0.558 ± 0.526 and 1,137 ± 0.222mm respectively. In the 3-month reevaluation, was also obtained great statistical significance between both groups for bleeding on probing (p <0.001), with values of 0.568 ± 0.282 for the control group and 0.480 ± 0.336 for the test group. Conclusions: The use of diode laser as an adjunctive therapy to the conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis showed promising results, being more effective reducing the inflammation of the peri-implant tissue, positioning itself as a valuable tool for the treatment of peri-implant pathologies. Sin financiación No data JCR 2020 0.481 SJR (2020) Q2, 63/141 Dentistry (miscellaneous) No data IDR 2029 UEV

10.4317/medoral.56424http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6969958