6533b85ffe1ef96bd12c1240

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Nitrate removal microbiology in woodchip bioreactors : a case-study with full-scale bioreactors treating aquaculture effluents

Marja TiirolaHenri M.p. SiljanenSanni L. AaltoSanni L. AaltoPer Bovbjerg PedersenSuvi SuurnäkkiMathis Von Ahnen

subject

inorganic chemicalsdenitrifikaatioEnvironmental EngineeringDenitrification010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesNitrogenAquaculture010501 environmental sciences01 natural sciencesDenitrifying bacteriachemistry.chemical_compoundBioreactorstyppiNitraterecirculation aquaculture systemsBioreactorEnvironmental ChemistryWaste Management and DisposalEffluentvesiviljely (kalatalous)0105 earth and related environmental sciencesNitratesdenitrificationnitrous oxideorganic chemicalsfood and beveragesRecirculating aquaculture systemdityppioksidiequipment and suppliesPollution6. Clean waterDNRAnitrogen removalchemistryMicrobial population biology13. Climate actionEnvironmental chemistrybioreaktoritDenitrificationWoodchips

description

Woodchip bioreactors are viable low-cost nitrate (NO3−) removal applications for treating agricultural and aquaculture discharges. The active microbial biofilms growing on woodchips are conducting nitrogen (N) removal, reducing NO3− while oxidizing the carbon (C) from woodchips. However, bioreactor age, and changes in the operating conditions or in the microbial community might affect the NO3− removal as well as potentially promote nitrous oxide (N2O) production through either incomplete denitrification or dissimilatory NO3− reduction to ammonium (DNRA). Here, we combined stable isotope approach, amplicon sequencing, and captured metagenomics for studying the potential NO3− removal rates, and the abundance and community composition of microbes involved in N transformation processes in the three different full-scale woodchip bioreactors treating recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) effluents. We confirmed denitrification producing di‑nitrogen gas (N2) to be the primary NO3− removal pathway, but found that 6% of NO3− could be released as N2O under high NO3− concentrations and low amounts of bioavailable C, whereas DNRA rates tend to increase with the C amount. The abundance of denitrifiers was equally high between the studied bioreactors, yet the potential NO3− removal rates were linked to the denitrifying community diversity. The same core proteobacterial groups were driving the denitrification, while Bacteroidetes dominated the DNRA carrying microbes in all the three bioreactors studied. Altogether, our results suggest that woodchip bioreactors have a high genetic potential for NO3− removal through a highly abundant and diverse denitrifying community, but that the rates and dynamics between the NO3− removal pathways depend on the other factors (e.g., bioreactor design, operating conditions, and the amount of bioavailable C in relation to the incoming NO3− concentrations).

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202003302587