6533b860fe1ef96bd12c308c
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Mismatch or allostatic load? Timing of life adversity differentially shapes gray matter volume and anxious temperament
Katharina DomschkeRobert ScharfenortManuel KuhnJan HaakerJürgen DeckertRaffael KalischPeter ZwanzgerTina B. LonsdorfDirk SchümannAnna Luisa MünsterkötterMiriam A. SchielePaul PauliMarcel RomanosAndreas Reifsubject
0301 basic medicineMalestressful life eventschildhood maltreatmentEmotionsAnxietySocial EnvironmentDevelopmental psychology0302 clinical medicineGray MatterVBMChildadversitymedia_commonDepressionAdult Survivors of Child AbuseAllostasisBrainGeneral MedicineOrgan SizeMagnetic Resonance ImagingAllostatic loadmedicine.anatomical_structureAllostasisAnxietyFemalemedicine.symptomPsychologymismatchallostatic loadAdultCognitive Neurosciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyAffect (psychology)AmygdalaLife Change Events03 medical and health sciencesYoung AdultmedicineHumansddc:610TemperamentAnterior cingulate cortexBrain morphometryOriginal ArticlesImage Enhancement030104 developmental biologyTemperament030217 neurology & neurosurgerydescription
Traditionally, adversity was defined as the accumulation of environmental events (allostatic load). Recently however, a mismatch between the early and the later (adult) environment (mismatch) has been hypothesized to be critical for disease development, a hypothesis that has not yet been tested explicitly in humans. We explored the impact of timing of life adversity (childhood and past year) on anxiety and depression levels (N = 833) and brain morphology (N = 129). Both remote (childhood) and proximal (recent) adversities were differentially mirrored in morphometric changes in areas critically involved in emotional processing (i.e. amygdala/hippocampus, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, respectively). The effect of adversity on affect acted in an additive way with no evidence for interactions (mismatch). Structural equation modeling demonstrated a direct effect of adversity on morphometric estimates and anxiety/depression without evidence of brain morphology functioning as a mediator. Our results highlight that adversity manifests as pronounced changes in brain morphometric and affective temperament even though these seem to represent distinct mechanistic pathways. A major goal of future studies should be to define critical time periods for the impact of adversity and strategies for intervening to prevent or reverse the effects of adverse childhood life experiences.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-11-13 | Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience |