6533b860fe1ef96bd12c3904
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids
Gerhard RichterPeter J. FroschHolger LessmannWolfgang UterRoland AschoffThomas FuchsClaudia PirkerJohannes GeierPatrick KochDetlef BeckerAxel SchnuchChristian Eckertsubject
AdultMaleAllergymedicine.medical_specialtyPathologyDermatology010501 environmental sciencesmedicine.disease_cause01 natural sciencesPatch testing030207 dermatology & venereal diseases03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineAllergenmedicineHumansImmunology and AllergyAllergic contact dermatitisAged0105 earth and related environmental sciencesbusiness.industryPatch testMiddle AgedPatch TestsIodopropynyl butylcarbamatemedicine.diseaseDermatology3. Good healthDermatitis OccupationalchemistryMetallurgyIrritantsFemaleIrritationbusinessOilsContact dermatitisdescription
Water-based metalworking fluids (MWFs) may cause both irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. Several well-known MWF allergens are available for patch testing, but considering the wide variety of possible components used in MWF, our diagnostic arsenal covers only a small part of potential allergens. We therefore selected 13 frequently used MWF components that might be sensitizers and had not yet been tested routinely. In 5 centres, 233 dermatitis patients with present or past occupational exposure to MWF were patch tested with this and other panels. Only 7 patients showed positive reactions to the study panel. Allergic reactions to the emulsifier diglycolamine [syn. 2-(2-aminoethoxy) ethanol] were seen in 5 patients, and 1 patient each reacted positively to 2-amino-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol (AEPD) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). Clinical relevance of the reactions to diglycolamine was unequivocally proven by its presence in the MWF from the patients' workplace in 3 cases. Diglycolamine seems to be an important MWF allergen, independently from monoethanolamine and diethanolamine. A test concentration of 1% petrolatum (pet.) appears to be appropriate. The importance of AEPD and MDEA as MWF allergens still remains to be established. The lack of positive test reactions to the other MWF components tested may be due to their low-sensitizing potential or too low a patch test concentration being used.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2003-08-01 | Contact Dermatitis |