6533b861fe1ef96bd12c59cc

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Validation and Measurement Invariance of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in a Spanish General Sample

Jaime Perales-puchaltBegoña EspejoIrene ChecaJuan Francisco Lisón

subject

confirmatory factor analysisHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesislcsh:MedicineAdultos - Conducta - España.050109 social psychologyPositive psychology.psychological assessmentpsychometric propertiesPublic welfare - Spain.well-beingSurveys and QuestionnairesStatisticsPath coefficientSalutAdulthood behavior - Spain.Path analysis (statistics)MathematicsScale of Positive and Negative Affects05 social scienceshealthEmotions.Confirmatory factor analysismeasurement invarianceAdultos - Calidad de vida - España.Spanish populationAdultPsychometricsConcurrent validitystructural equation modelingArticle050105 experimental psychologyStructural equation modelingEmociones.Adulthood - Quality of life - Spain.Humans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesPsychological testingMeasurement invarianceVidalcsh:REmocionsPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthReproducibility of ResultsCross-Sectional Studiesquality of lifeSpainBienestar social - España.Psicología positiva.Well-beingFactor Analysis Statistical

description

Este artículo se encuentra disponible en la siguiente URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8359 Este artículo pertenece a la sección "Health behavior, chronic disease and health promotion". Well-being has been measured based on di erent perspectives in positive psychology. However, it is necessary to measure a ects and emotions correctly and to explore the independence of positive and negative a ect. This cross-sectional study adapts and validates the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) with a non-probabilistic sample of 821 Spanish adults. A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed two related factors with two correlated errors. The average variance extracted was 0.502 for negative a ect (SPANE-N) and 0.588 for positive a ect (SPANE-P). The composite reliability was 0.791 for SPANE-N and 0.858 for SPANE-P. Measurement invariance analysis showed evidence of scalar invariance. Item-total corrected polyserial correlations showed values between 0.47 and 0.76. The path analysis used to test temporal stability, and the structural equation models used to test convergent and concurrent validity with other well-being measures, showed good fit. All path coe cients were statistically significant and over 0.480. For the validity models, the magnitude of the correlations was large and in the expected direction. The Spanish version of the SPANE show good psychometric properties. Future studies of emotional well-being in Spain can benefit from the use of this scale, and new studies must test cross-cultural invariance.

10.3390/ijerph17228359https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8359