6533b862fe1ef96bd12c6395

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Battery Models for Battery Powered Applications: A Comparative Study

Marco TrapanenseCiro SpataroVincenzo CastigliaRosario MiceliFabio ViolaRosa Anna MastromauroNicola Campagna

subject

Battery (electricity)Control and OptimizationComputer science020209 energyEnergy Engineering and Power Technology02 engineering and technologySettore ING-IND/32 - Convertitori Macchine E Azionamenti Elettricilcsh:TechnologyBattery management systemsparameter identificationBattery electric vehicles Battery model E-mobility Electric vehicles Parameter identification0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringElectrical and Electronic EngineeringEngineering (miscellaneous)e-mobility; electric vehicles; battery electric vehicles; battery model; parameter identificationelectric vehiclesRenewable Energy Sustainability and the Environmentlcsh:Tbattery electric vehiclesbattery model021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologyReliability engineeringSettore ING-IND/31 - Elettrotecnicae-mobility0210 nano-technologySettore ING-INF/07 - Misure Elettriche E ElettronicheEnergy (miscellaneous)

description

Battery models have gained great importance in recent years, thanks to the increasingly massive penetration of electric vehicles in the transport market. Accurate battery models are needed to evaluate battery performances and design an efficient battery management system. Different modeling approaches are available in literature, each one with its own advantages and disadvantages. In general, more complex models give accurate results, at the cost of higher computational efforts and time-consuming and costly laboratory testing for parametrization. For these reasons, for early stage evaluation and design of battery management systems, models with simple parameter identification procedures are the most appropriate and feasible solutions. In this article, three different battery modeling approaches are considered, and their parameters’ identification are described. Two of the chosen models require no laboratory tests for parametrization, and most of the information are derived from the manufacturer’s datasheet, while the last battery model requires some laboratory assessments. The models are then validated at steady state, comparing the simulation results with the datasheet discharge curves, and in transient operation, comparing the simulation results with experimental results. The three modeling and parametrization approaches are systematically applied to the LG 18650HG2 lithium-ion cell, and results are presented, compared and discussed.

10.3390/en13164085https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en13164085