6533b870fe1ef96bd12cf12e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Prevalence of maxillary canine impaction in skeletal Class III malocclusions compared to Class I malocclusions

Antonella PolimeniGaetano IerardoIole VozzaValeria LuzziMatteo SaccucciGian Luca SfasciottiGabriele Di Carlo

subject

Populationtooth impactionOrthodontics03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineangle Class IIImaxillary canine impactionTooth impactionMedicine030212 general & internal medicineeducationskeletal Class IIIGeneral DentistryOrthodonticseducation.field_of_studybusiness.industryClass iii malocclusionImpactionResearchSignificant differenceMaxillary canineskeletal Class III; angle Class III; maxillary canine impaction; tooth impaction030206 dentistrymedicine.diseaseSkeletal class:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASbusinessAngle class iii

description

Background The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate if an orthodontic population of Class III malocclusion patients shows a different prevalence of maxillary canine impaction than Class I subjects. Material and methods Fifty-eight subjects were retrospectively selected and assigned to the Class I group (n= 32) or the Class III group (n= 26), depending on the ANB and WITS values. Lateral cephalograms were used to collect angular and linear measurements that described the skeletal and dental maxillary features of the subjects, while orthopantomography was used to assess the impaction or the correct eruption of the maxillary canines. An independent samples T-test or a Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the cephalometric values between the two groups, while a chi-squared test was used to evaluate the distribution of maxillary canine impaction between the two groups. Results No statistically significant difference was found for the cephalometric variables, and the frequency of canine impaction showed no difference between the Class III and Class I subjects. Conclusions Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions did not show a different prevalence of canine impaction; therefore, such skeletal features cannot be used as a diagnostic aid for assessment of the risk of maxillary canine impaction. Key words:Skeletal Class III, Angle Class III, maxillary canine impaction, tooth impaction.

yearjournalcountryeditionlanguage
2019-01-01
10.4317/jced.55478https://hdl.handle.net/10550/70635