6533b870fe1ef96bd12cf394

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quantifying changes in EEG complexity induced by photic stimulation.

Silvia ErlaGiandomenico NolloLuca Faes

subject

AdultMalePhotic StimulationComputer scienceHealth InformaticsElectroencephalographyMachine learningcomputer.software_genreBrain mappingComplexity indexHealth Information ManagementReference ValuesmedicineHumansEEGPredictabilityPredictability mapVisual stimulationHealth InformaticAdvanced and Specialized NursingBrain Mappingmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryStochastic processLocal linear predictionPattern recognitionElectroencephalographySignal Processing Computer-AssistedNeurophysiologymedicine.anatomical_structureNonlinear DynamicsScalpSettore ING-INF/06 - Bioingegneria Elettronica E InformaticaFemaleArtificial intelligencebusinesscomputerAlgorithmsPhotic Stimulation

description

Summary Objectives: This study aims to characterize EEG complexity, measured as the prediction error resulting from nonlinear prediction, in healthy humans during photic stimulation. Methods: EEGs were recorded from 15 subjects with eyes closed (EC) and eyes open (EO), during the baseline condition and during stroboscopic photic stimulation (PS) at 5, 10, and 15 Hz. The mean squared prediction error (MSPE) resulting from nearest neighbor local linear prediction was taken as complexity index. Complexity maps were generated interpolating the MSPE index over a schematic scalp representation. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that: i) EEG shows good predictability in all conditions and seems to be well explained by a linear stochastic process; ii) the complexity is lower with EC than with EO and increases significantly during PS, to a lesser extent during 10 Hz stimulation; iii) significant differences of EEG complexity are detectable between anterior-central and posterior scalp regions. Conclusions: Changes in EEG complexity during PS can be successfully assessed using nonlinear prediction. The observed modifications in the patterns of complexity seem to reflect neurophysiological behaviors and suggest future applicability of the method in clinical settings.

10.3414/me09-02-0031https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20490424