6533b870fe1ef96bd12cfc51
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A space weather tool for identifying eruptive active regions
Paolo PaganoStephanie L. YardleyDuncan H. Mackaysubject
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesSpace weatherSolar magnetic fieldsFOS: Physical sciencesSpace weather01 natural sciences3rd-NDASSolar coronal mass ejections0103 physical sciencesRegional sciencemedia_common.cataloged_instanceQB AstronomyEuropean union010303 astronomy & astrophysicsSolar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)QC0105 earth and related environmental sciencesmedia_commonQBPhysicsHorizon (archaeology)European researchAstronomy and AstrophysicsSolar active region magnetic fieldsSolar active regionsQC PhysicsAstrophysics - Solar and Stellar AstrophysicsSpace and Planetary Sciencedescription
Funding: UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (UK) through the consolidated grant ST/N000609/1 and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 647214); UK STFC via the Consolidated Grant SMC1/YST025 and SMC1/YST037 (S.L.Y.); UK STFC and the ERC (SynergyGrant: WHOLE SUN, Grant Agreement No. 810218) for financial support (DHM). One of the main goals of solar physics is the timely identification of eruptive active regions. Space missions such as Solar Orbiter or future Space Weather forecasting missions would largely benefit from this achievement.Our aim is to produce a relatively simple technique that can provide real time indications or predictions that an active region will produce an eruption. We expand on the theoretical work of Pagano et al.(2019) that was able to distinguish eruptive from non-eruptive active regions.From this we introduce a new operational metric that uses a combination of observed line-of-sight magnetograms, 3D data-driven simulations and the projection of the 3D simulations forward in time. Results show that the new metric correctly distinguishes active regions as eruptive when observable signatures of eruption have been identified and as non-eruptive when there are no observable signatures of eruption. After successfully distinguishing eruptive from non-eruptive active regions we illustrate how this metric may be used in a “real-time” operational sense were three levels of warning are categorised. These categories are: high risk (red), medium risk (amber) and low risk (green) of eruption. Through considering individual cases we find that the separation into eruptive and non-eruptive active regions is more robust the longer the time series of observed magnetograms used to simulate the build up of magnetic stress and free magnetic energy within the active region. Finally, we conclude that this proof of concept study delivers promising results where the ability to categorise the risk of an eruption is a major achievement. Postprint Peer reviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-01-01 |