6533b870fe1ef96bd12d081c
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and cystatin C compared to the estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict risk in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.
Daniel KrausAnne SchauerChristiane DrechslerChristoph BickelStephan BaldusStergios TzikasKarl J. LacknerAndreas M. ZeiherTanja ZellerStefan BlankenbergLars PalapiesThomas MünzelBeatrice Von JeinsenTill Kellersubject
Malemedicine.medical_specialtyUrinary systemMyocardial InfarctionRenal function030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyurologic and male genital diseasesCohort Studies03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineLipocalin-2Predictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsInternal medicinemedicineClinical endpointHumans030212 general & internal medicineMyocardial infarctionCystatin CAgedAged 80 and overFramingham Risk Scorebiologybusiness.industryAcute kidney injuryMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseCystatin Cbiology.proteinCardiologyFemaleCystatinCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessBiomarkersFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration Ratedescription
Abstract Introduction Impaired renal function, reflected by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or cystatin C, is a strong risk predictor in the presence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) is an early marker of acute kidney injury. uNGAL might also be a good predictor of outcome in patients with cardiovascular disease. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of uNGAL compared to eGFR and cystatin C in patients with suspected AMI. Methods 1818 patients were enrolled with suspected AMI. Follow-up information on the combined endpoint of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction was obtained 6months after enrolment and was available in 1804 patients. 63 events (3.5%) were registered. Results While cystatin C and eGFR were strong risk predictors for the primary endpoint even adjusted for several variables, uNGAL was not independently associated with outcome: When applied continuously uNGAL was associated with outcome but did not remain a statistically significant predictor after several adjustments (i.e. eGFR). By adding cystatin C or uNGAL to GRACE risk score variables, only cystatin C could improve the predictive value while uNGAL showed no improvement. Conclusion We could show that cystatin C is an independent risk predictor in patients with suspected AMI and cystatin C can add improvement to the commonly used GRACE risk score. In contrast uNGAL is not independently associated with outcome and seems not to add further prognostic information to GRACE risk score.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-12-18 | International journal of cardiology |