6533b871fe1ef96bd12d1044

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Analysis of marginal bone loss and implant stability quotient by resonance frequency analysis in different osteointegrated implant systems. Randomized prospective clinical trial

Rosa María Díaz-sánchezJosé-luis Gutiérrez-pérezMaría-ángeles Serrera-figalloDaniel Torres-lagaresMaría-isabel González-martínJosé María Delgado-muñoz

subject

Malemedicine.medical_treatmentAlveolar Bone LossDentistryDental AbutmentsMandibleProsthesisOsseointegrationlaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawOsseointegrationMaxillaMedicineHumansProspective StudiesGeneral DentistryAgedDental Implantsbusiness.industryResearchDental prosthesisDental Implantation EndosseousResonance Frequency Analysis030206 dentistryMiddle Aged:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Implant stability quotientResonance frequency analysisDental Implant-Abutment DesignOtorhinolaryngologyDental Prosthesis DesignUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASSurgeryFemaleImplantDental Prosthesis Implant-SupportedOral Surgerybusiness

description

Background The aim of the present prospective clinical study is to compare the stability of the implant-bone interface by the ISQ quotient and marginal bone loss (MBL) rate during one year of follow-up in four system implants with the same surface and different design. Material and Methods Prospective randomized clinical trial of 21 patients in which four implant systems with the same surface and different design were placed. Patients were treated by the same operator following a similar surgical protocol with submerged technique. The second surgery to perform the prosthesis was performed at 3 months. All patients went to their review at 6 months and a year. A periapical radiograph for crestal bone analysis and an Implant stability quotient by resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) analysis were taken at baseline and the reviews. Results No statistically significant differences were found in the Implant stability quotient by resonance frequency analysis and Marginal Bone Loss in the four types of implants. The ISQ increased from the moment of insertion of the implant until the revision to the year, showing an increase of the stability implant, being this increasing less between the 6 months and the year. Conclusions Differences in the design of the four implants tested in this study did not show statistically significant differences in any of the variables studied, so the implant design does not influence implant stability and marginal bone loss in the first year after placement. Key words:Marginal bone loss, implant stability quotient, dental implant, clinical trial.

10.4317/medoral.22742http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6441592