6533b871fe1ef96bd12d1b7d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Machine learning-based models to predict modes of toxic action of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Stephen J. BarigyeGerardo M. Casañola-martinJuan A. Castillo-garitA. TorreblancaHai Pham-theFrancisco Torrens

subject

Quantitative structure–activity relationshipAntiprotozoal AgentsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipBioengineeringModes of toxic action010501 environmental sciencesMachine learningcomputer.software_genre01 natural sciencesMachine Learningchemistry.chemical_compoundPhenolsMolecular descriptorDrug DiscoveryPhenols0105 earth and related environmental sciencesCiliated protozoanArtificial neural networkbusiness.industryTetrahymena pyriformisGeneral Medicine0104 chemical sciencesSupport vector machine010404 medicinal & biomolecular chemistrychemistryTetrahymena pyriformisMolecular MedicineArtificial intelligenceNeural Networks Computerbusinesscomputer

description

The phenols are structurally heterogeneous pollutants and they present a variety of modes of toxic action (MOA), including polar narcotics, weak acid respiratory uncouplers, pro-electrophiles, and soft electrophiles. Because it is often difficult to determine correctly the mechanism of action of a compound, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods, which have proved their interest in toxicity prediction, can be used. In this work, several QSAR models for the prediction of MOA of 221 phenols to the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena pyriformis, using Chemistry Development Kit descriptors, are reported. Four machine learning techniques (ML), k-nearest neighbours, support vector machine, classification trees, and artificial neural networks, have been used to develop several models with higher accuracies and predictive capabilities for distinguishing between four MOAs. They showed global accuracy values between 95.9% and 97.7% and area under Receiver Operator Curve values between 0.978 and 0.998; additionally, false alarm rate values were below 8.2% for training set. In order to validate our models, cross-validation (10-folds-out) and external test-set were performed with good behaviour in all cases. These models, obtained with ML techniques, were compared with others previously reported by other researchers, and the improvement was significant.

10.1080/1062936x.2017.1376705https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29022372