6533b871fe1ef96bd12d26e1

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Assessment of the interest of the geriatric oncology consultation among French general practitioners

Claire CharbonnierSophie MarilierAdèle CueffPatrick ManckoundiaValérie QuipourtSandrine Dabakuyo

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyGeriatric oncology consultationAttitude of Health Personnelphysicianseducation[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer[ SDV.MHEP.GEG ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Geriatry and gerontologyMedical Oncology[ SDV.CAN ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineresponse ratesNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesCare planGeneral practitionersmedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicinecareReferral and ConsultationGeriatricscancer-patientsbusiness.industry[SDV.MHEP.GEG]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Geriatry and gerontologyCancer typeMiddle Aged3. Good healthElderly patientsOncologyGeriatric oncologyGeriatrics030220 oncology & carcinogenesisFamily medicineGlobal Positioning SystemFemaleFranceGeriatrics and Gerontologybusinessmanagement

description

International audience; OBJECTIVE: We assessed the interest of the geriatric oncology (GO) consultation (GOC) among general practitioners (GPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey among GPs whose patients had had a GOC in 2012. A questionnaire was sent to GPs. The 1st part collected GPs' characteristics including medical education in geriatrics and GO, and knowledge of GOC. The following parts concerned the GOC and included the cancer type, GOC report and care plan. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-six questionnaires corresponding to 94 GPs were collected. Concerning the GPs' characteristics, age range 50-59 (44.7%), men (62.8%) and urban practice (79.8%) were the most represented, 80.8% had no expertise in geriatrics, 60.6% knew of the existence of GOCs, and 14.9% had received medical education in GO. The most frequent cancer location was gynecological (40.7%) (82.6% were breast cancers). Of the GPs, 69.8% had received a GOC report and 92% were (very) satisfied with the delivery time. A care plan was proposed after the GOC in 83% of cases. It was satisfactory in 96.4% of cases, and applied by 74.7% of GPs. Sixteen percent of GPs were called by the GO team. The less the GP was satisfied with the GOC, the more he or she wanted phone contact (p=0.02); 94% of GPs considered the GOC (very) satisfactory. Sixty-seven percent of GPs wanted to be trained in GO. CONCLUSION: Very few GPs had been trained in geriatrics and/or GO. They were mostly satisfied with GOC and expressed a wish to be trained in GO.

10.1016/j.jgo.2015.10.184https://hal-univ-bourgogne.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01292010