6533b872fe1ef96bd12d2fba

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Post-infectious myocardial Infarction: Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve outcomes? A propensity-score matched analysis

Jean-claude BeerPhilippe BrunelYves CottinAlain PutotFrédéric ChaguéMarianne ZellerPatrick Manckoundia

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyrespiratory tract infectionmedicine.medical_treatmentlcsh:Medicine030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyArticletype 2 myocardial infarctionCoronary artery disease03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicinemedicinepneumonia030212 general & internal medicinecardiovascular diseasesMyocardial infarctionProspective cohort studycoronary care unitbusiness.industrylcsh:Rpercutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseasemortalityStenosismyocardial infarctionsurgical procedures operativeConventional PCIPropensity score matchingCoronary care unitoutcomeCardiologyObservational studyCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicinebusinessacute infection

description

Acute infection is a frequent trigger of myocardial infarction (MI). However, whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves post-infectious MI prognosis is a major but unsolved issue. In this prospective multicenter study from coronary care units, we performed propensity score-matched analysis to compare outcomes in patients with and without PCI for post-infectious MI with angiography-proven significant coronary stenosis (&gt

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvdsp.2020.10.006