6533b872fe1ef96bd12d2fba
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Post-infectious myocardial Infarction: Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve outcomes? A propensity-score matched analysis
Jean-claude BeerPhilippe BrunelYves CottinAlain PutotFrédéric ChaguéMarianne ZellerPatrick Manckoundiasubject
medicine.medical_specialtyrespiratory tract infectionmedicine.medical_treatmentlcsh:Medicine030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyArticletype 2 myocardial infarctionCoronary artery disease03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicinemedicinepneumonia030212 general & internal medicinecardiovascular diseasesMyocardial infarctionProspective cohort studycoronary care unitbusiness.industrylcsh:Rpercutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseasemortalityStenosismyocardial infarctionsurgical procedures operativeConventional PCIPropensity score matchingCoronary care unitoutcomeCardiologyObservational studyCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicinebusinessacute infectiondescription
Acute infection is a frequent trigger of myocardial infarction (MI). However, whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves post-infectious MI prognosis is a major but unsolved issue. In this prospective multicenter study from coronary care units, we performed propensity score-matched analysis to compare outcomes in patients with and without PCI for post-infectious MI with angiography-proven significant coronary stenosis (>
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-05-26 | Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements |