6533b872fe1ef96bd12d3a29

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement: diagnostic value for differentiating HCC from other primary liver carcinomas

Daniel R. LudwigAlessandro FurlanAmir A. BorhaniAmir A. BorhaniAllan TsungKathryn J. FowlerTyler J. FraumRoberto Cannella

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyCarcinoma HepatocellularHepatocellular carcinomaPopulationContrast MediaX-ray computedMalignancySensitivity and SpecificityLiver neoplasm030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging03 medical and health sciencesMagnetic resonance imaging0302 clinical medicineOcclusionmedicineHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingeducationTomographyIntrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaRetrospective StudiesIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaNeuroradiologyeducation.field_of_studymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingInterventional radiologyGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseasedigestive system diseasesBile Ducts IntrahepaticBile Duct Neoplasms030220 oncology & carcinogenesisHepatocellular carcinomaRadiologybusiness

description

To evaluate targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement as potential new LI-RADS features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other non-HCC primary liver carcinomas (PLCs). This IRB-approved, retrospective study was performed at two liver transplant centers. The final population included 375 patients with pathologically proven lesions imaged between 2007 and 2017 with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. The cohort consisted of 165 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and 74 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, with the addition of 136 HCCs for control. Two abdominal radiologists (R1; R2) independently reviewed the imaging studies (112 CT; 263 MRI) and recorded the presence of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement including encasement, narrowing, tethering, occlusion, and obliteration. The sensitivity and specificity of each feature were calculated for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs. Cohen’s kappa (k) test was used to assess inter-reader agreement. The sensitivity of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs was 27.5% and 32.6% (R1 and R2) and the specificity was 98.2% and 97.3% (R1 and R2). Among the features of tumor vascular involvement, those providing the highest sensitivity for non-HCC PLCs were vascular encasement (R1: 34.3%; R2: 37.2%) and obliteration (R1: 25.5%; R2: 29.7%). The highest specificity for non-HCC PLCs was provided by tethering (R1: 100%; R2: 97.1%) and occlusion (R1: 99.3%; R2: 99.3%). The inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial (k = 0.48–0.77). Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement demonstrated high specificity for non-HCC malignancy. • Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement have high specificity (92–100%) for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs, regardless of the presence of liver risk factors. • In the subset of patients with risk factors for HCC, the sensitivity of signs of tumor vascular involvement decreases for both readers (1.7–20.3%), while the specificity increases reaching values higher than 94.2%. • The inter-reader agreement is substantial for targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images (k = 0.74) and moderate to substantial for signs of tumor vascular involvement (k = 0.48–0.77).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07743-x