6533b873fe1ef96bd12d4f7a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Illegitimate tasks in health care: Illegitimate task types and associations with occupational well-being.

Ulla KinnunenMari HuhtalaTaru FeldtSaija MaunoKiia Kilponen

subject

work engagementmielekkyys515 PsychologytyöhyvinvointiApplied psychologyBurnoutnursesuupumus03 medical and health sciencesmeaningfulness of work0302 clinical medicineSurveys and QuestionnairesOccupational stressorHealth careHumans030212 general & internal medicineBurnout ProfessionalGeneral Nursingburnout030504 nursingbusiness.industryWork engagementStressorJob designGeneral Medicinetyön sisältö3142 Public health care science environmental and occupational healthterveydenhuoltohenkilöstö3. Good healthTask (computing)Cross-Sectional StudiesWell-beingillegitimate taskstehtävät316 Nursing0305 other medical sciencePsychologybusinessDelivery of Health Carehoitotyö

description

Aims and objectives: The aims of the study were to identify content categories of unreasonable and unnecessary illegitimate tasks and to investigate how unreasonable and unnecessary tasks relate to occupational wellbeing. Background: Illegitimate tasks are a common stressor among healthcare professionals, and they have been shown to have negative associations with occupational well-being. Despite this evidence, research has not yet uncovered what kinds of tasks healthcare professionals consider illegitimate. Design and method: The data gathered by means of an online survey consisted of 1024 municipal healthcare organisation employees. A theory-driven qualitative content analysis was used to analyse freely reported illegitimate tasks. For occupational well-being associations, a mixed-methods approach was used (ANCOVA and linear regression analysis). The STROBE statement—checklist for cross-sectional studies was used. Results: Eight content categories were found for illegitimate tasks. For unreasonable tasks, these were (1) tasks outside one's occupational role (78% of all unreasonable tasks), (2) conflicting or unclear demands (9%), (3) tasks with insufficient resources (8%) and (4) tasks with difficult consequences (5%), and for unnecessary tasks, these were (1) impractical or outdated working habits (31% of all unnecessary tasks), (2) tasks related to dysfunctional technology (30%), (3) unnecessary procedures (27%) and (4) tasks related to bureaucratic demands (12%). Unreasonable and unnecessary tasks were associated with higher levels of burnout and lower work engagement and the meaningfulness of work. Conclusions: Our findings support the theory that illegitimate tasks are an occupational stressor with negative effects on burnout, work engagement and meaningfulness of work. Relevance to clinical practice: The study offers insights into the types of tasks health care employees see as illegitimate and highlights the importance of good job design in promoting occupational well-being in health care. publishedVersion Peer reviewed

10.1111/jocn.15767https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33829574