6533b873fe1ef96bd12d576f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Inactivation Principle: Mathematical Solutions Minimizing the Absolute Work and Biological Implications for the Planning of Arm Movements

Frédéric JeanBastien BerretThierry PozzoJean-paul GauthierCharalambos PapaxanthisChristian Darlot

subject

MaleMESH: Range of Motion ArticularMESH : Physical ExertionMESH : MovementOptimality criterion[SDV.MHEP.PHY] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Tissues and Organs [q-bio.TO]Computer scienceMESH: Muscle ContractionMESH: GravitationMESH : Models BiologicalMESH: MovementKinematicsMESH: Postural BalanceMESH : Gravitation0302 clinical medicineNeuroscience/Motor SystemsMESH : FeedbackMESH : BiomechanicsRange of Motion ArticularMESH: ArmMESH : Jointslcsh:QH301-705.5Postural BalanceMESH: Biomechanics0303 health sciencesNeuroscience/Behavioral NeuroscienceEcology[ SDV.MHEP.PHY ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Tissues and Organs [q-bio.TO]MESH: FeedbackMESH : AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaMathematical theoryMESH: JointsComputational Theory and MathematicsModeling and SimulationArmResearch ArticleGravitationMuscle ContractionComputer Science/Systems and Control TheoryAdultMESH : MaleMovementPhysical ExertionComputational Biology/Computational NeuroscienceMESH: Psychomotor PerformanceModels BiologicalMESH : ArmFeedbackMESH: Physical Exertion03 medical and health sciencesCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceMESH : Postural BalanceControl theory[SDV.MHEP.PHY]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Tissues and Organs [q-bio.TO]GeneticsHumansNeuroscience/Theoretical NeuroscienceMolecular BiologyEcology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsSimulation030304 developmental biologyMESH: HumansMESH : HumansWork (physics)MESH: Models BiologicalMotor controlMESH: AdultMESH : Psychomotor PerformanceFunction (mathematics)Optimal controlMESH: MaleTerm (time)MESH : Range of Motion Articularlcsh:Biology (General)MESH : Muscle ContractionJoints030217 neurology & neurosurgeryMathematicsPsychomotor Performance

description

An important question in the literature focusing on motor control is to determine which laws drive biological limb movements. This question has prompted numerous investigations analyzing arm movements in both humans and monkeys. Many theories assume that among all possible movements the one actually performed satisfies an optimality criterion. In the framework of optimal control theory, a first approach is to choose a cost function and test whether the proposed model fits with experimental data. A second approach (generally considered as the more difficult) is to infer the cost function from behavioral data. The cost proposed here includes a term called the absolute work of forces, reflecting the mechanical energy expenditure. Contrary to most investigations studying optimality principles of arm movements, this model has the particularity of using a cost function that is not smooth. First, a mathematical theory related to both direct and inverse optimal control approaches is presented. The first theoretical result is the Inactivation Principle, according to which minimizing a term similar to the absolute work implies simultaneous inactivation of agonistic and antagonistic muscles acting on a single joint, near the time of peak velocity. The second theoretical result is that, conversely, the presence of non-smoothness in the cost function is a necessary condition for the existence of such inactivation. Second, during an experimental study, participants were asked to perform fast vertical arm movements with one, two, and three degrees of freedom. Observed trajectories, velocity profiles, and final postures were accurately simulated by the model. In accordance, electromyographic signals showed brief simultaneous inactivation of opposing muscles during movements. Thus, assuming that human movements are optimal with respect to a certain integral cost, the minimization of an absolute-work-like cost is supported by experimental observations. Such types of optimality criteria may be applied to a large range of biological movements.

10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000194http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2561290