Search results for "Argument"
showing 10 items of 522 documents
Negoziare ed argomentare in tema d'identità e di valori
2013
L'articolo mira ad esplorare l'uso della negoziazione e dell'argomentazione nel riconoscimento delle idendità e dei valori da parte della comunità politica
A Just Criminalization of Irregular Immigration: Is It Possible?
2015
The aim of this paper is to question, from the perspective of a principled theory of criminalization, the legitimacy of making irregular immigration (IM) a crime. In order to do this, I identify three main ways in which the political decision to introduce a crime of IM may be defended: according to the first, IM is a malum in se the wrongness of which resides in its being a violation of states’ territorial sovereignty; according to the second, IM is a justified malum prohibitum the wrongness of which resides in its being a violation of a justified immigration regulation; according to the third, IM is a malum in se the wrongness of which resides in its harmful consequences for receiving stat…
Some arguments supporting an interpretative approach to legal knowledge
2014
La scienza giuridica di matrice giuspositivista istituisce un legame stringente tra diritto e linguaggio. Secondo questa prospettiva, il diritto è il discorso del legislatore e la scienza giuridica non è altro che un discorso sopra un discorso: un meta-linguaggio descrittivo del linguaggio prescrittivo del legislatore. Questa concezione del diritto e questo modello di scienza giuridica sono in crisi da alcuni decenni. Nel mio saggio presento quattro argomenti volti a evidenziare i limiti di questo approccio al diritto: l’argomento epistemologico, l’argomento del pluralismo epistemologico, l’argomento della svolta interpretativa e, infine, l’argomento funzionalista. Questi argomenti non stan…
Volpi e ricci, ovvero: che cosa rimane del positivismo giuridico?
2017
Sino alla prima metà del xx secolo tutti i principali giuspositivisti condividevano l’idea che il positivismo giuridico presupponesse necessariamente una meta-etica soggettivista e non-cognitivista. Il legame tra una meta-etica soggettivista e non-cognitivista e il positivismo giuridico ad un certo punto è stato reciso. Importanti giuspositivisti cominciano a mettere in discussione che il positivismo giuridico implichi una determinata prospettiva meta-etica. In questo saggio avanzo tre obiezioni al positivismo giuridico da cui che il positivismo giuridico può almeno in parte difendersi solo a condizione di rimanere fedele al soggettivismo e al non-cognitivismo Until the middle of the last c…
La crisi del dibattito pubblico nell'Italia contemporanea: il discorso populista
2019
In this paper I discuss the current state of the so called populist political discourse in Italy. In particular my purpose is to shed light on some features of this kind of discourse in order to show the relation between language and policy in the discourse of populism. In this perspective I will follow the eight key points that, according to Diamanti & Lazar (2018), identify the actual populist movements, in order to verify if – and, in that case, which – linguistic traits characterize their discourse.The analysis will be focused on the semantic and argumentative aspects of the discourse of some of the most important political actors in contemporary Italy.
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina (ed.), Estrategias argumentativas y discurso político, Madrid Arco/Libros, 2016, 315 pp. ISBN. 978-84-7635-949-5.
2017
Reseña del volumen Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina (ed.), Estrategias argumentativas y discurso político, Madrid Arco/Libros, 2016.
Maximizing versus satisficing in the digital age: Disjoint scales and the case for “construct consensus”
2018
Abstract A question facing us today, in the new and rapidly evolving digital age, is whether searching for the best option – being a maximizer – leads to greater happiness and better outcomes than settling on the first good enough option found – or “satisficing.” Answers to this question inform behavioural insights to improve well-being and decision-making in policy and organizational settings. Yet, the answers to this fundamental question of measurement of the happiness of a maximizer versus a satisficer in the current psychological literature are: 1) conflicting; 2) anchored on the use of the first scale published to measure maximization as an individual-difference, and 3) unable to descr…
Konfutse historian lopussa? : konfutselainen retoriikka Singaporen poliittisella areenalla 20. vuosisadan lopulla
2004
Collaborative argumentation through role-play by students on a degree programme in social services
2019
The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of collaborative argumentation by students enrolled in a degree program in social services. Students (n = 29) in a University of Applied Sciences participated in role-play discussions and problem solving on adolescents’ substance abuse. The discussions were conducted either online (15 students) or face-to-face (14 students). The data comprise the students’ asynchronous online and face-to-face discussions, which were analysed by identifying discussion fragments relevant in collaborative argumentation, and by comparing the results of the two groups. The results showed that the face-to-face discussions were more collaborative than the online …