Search results for "Oligopoly"

showing 10 items of 41 documents

Is the French mobile phone cartel really a cartel?

2009

International audience; France Telecom (FT), SFR and Bouygues Telecom (BT) have been fined by France's Conseil de la Concurrence (CC) for organizing a mobile phone cartel with stable market shares (one-half, one-third and one-sixth, respectively) and for directly exchanging commercial information. While not contesting the legal decision, it is argued here that the economic reasoning is flawed. (1) As the CC made much of the firms' stable market shares, we have first followed this line of reasoning by considering that the market shares are quotas under uniform costs. Even if there is a general incentive to form a monopolistic cartel, BT was too small for it to be worth its while to join it; it i…

JEL : K - Law and Economics/K.K2 - Regulation and Business Law/K.K2.K21 - Antitrust LawEconomics and EconometricsCournotJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsStackelbergMobile telephonyCartelJEL L13 L41 L96 D43 K21Management Science and Operations ResearchCournot competitionIndustrial and Manufacturing EngineeringMicroeconomicsCompetition (economics)Monopolistic competitionJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsEconomicsStackelberg competition[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesMarket shareGSMARCEPJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionCartel[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGeneral Business Management and AccountingJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionJEL: K - Law and Economics/K.K2 - Regulation and Business Law/K.K2.K21 - Antitrust LawJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive PracticesConseil de la ConcurrenceIncentiveMonopolyMobile phoneJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive PracticesInternational Journal of Production Economics
researchProduct

Evaluation de la concurrence généralisée : un outil matriciel

1993

Input-output matrices and structural analysis are applied to the analysis and forecast of consequences of offensive actions in the case of multiproduct multimarket large firms.

JEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsMatricesstructuralJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Marketsinput-outputconcurrence[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesstructure[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
researchProduct

Growth and sustainability of agricultural systems: the case of Sicilian wine-growing farms

2016

International audience; The Sicilian wine-growing sector is characterised by the presence on the one hand of many small enterprises that limit their activity to the first stage of the supply chain (field production) and on the other of few enterprises that adopt a strategy of total vertical integration, from the production to the sale of wine. The first group of enterprises operates in a competitive market and in many cases with marginal revenues that are lower than marginal costs, leading entrepreneurs to abandon the activity of grape production. The second group operates in an oligopolistic market and it is able to compete in an international market. Findings reveal that competitive advan…

Marginal costEconomics and EconometricscompetitiveneSupply chain0211 other engineering and technologies0507 social and economic geography02 engineering and technologyentrepreneurshipwine-growing farms.Competitive advantagelocal developmentOligopolyMarket economyAgrifood productSettore AGR/01 - Economia Ed Estimo RuraleEconomicsProduction (economics)Perfect competitionBusiness and International Managementeconomic sustainabilitySicilysupply chainSupply chain management[QFIN]Quantitative Finance [q-fin]05 social sciencesSMEsmall and medium enterprise021107 urban & regional planningCompetitor analysisrural territoryincome8. Economic growth050703 geography
researchProduct

Les followers ont-ils vraiment de l'importance dans le modèle de Stackelberg?

2011

In this paper, we consider a T-stage linear model of Stackelberg oligopoly. First, we show geometrically and analytically that under the two conditions of linear market demand and identical constant marginal costs, the T-stage Stackelberg model reduces to a model where T oligopolies exploit residual demand sequentially. At any stage, leaders behave as if followers did not matter. Second, we study social welfare and convergence toward competitive equilibrium. Especially, we consider the velocity of convergence as the number of firms increases. The convergence is faster when reallocating firms from the most to the less populated cohort until equalizing the size of all cohorts.

Marginal costEconomics and Econometricsfollower's output indexíndice de producto del seguidorJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Marketsmodèle généralisé de Stackelberggeneralized Stackelberg competitioncompetencia de Stackelberg generalizadaCompetitive equilibriumrazón de descuento del markup del líderSupply and demandlcsh:Economic history and conditionsOligopolyjel:L20JEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Marketseconomía linealgeneralized Stackelberg competition.Stackelberg competitionEconomicsLeader’s markup discount factor linear economy follower’s output discount factor myopic behavior[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesfacteurs d'escompte markupJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives Organization and Behavior/L.L2.L20 - General[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceHB71-74lcsh:HB71-74Economic history and conditionsLinear modellcsh:Economics as a scienceConvergence (economics)HC10-1085leader's markup discount ratio[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGeneral Business Management and AccountingJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives Organization and Behavior/L.L2.L20 - GeneralEconomics as a sciencelinear economyjel:L13leader's markup discount ratio linear economy follower's output index generalized Stackelberg competitionlcsh:HC10-1085économie linéaireStatistics Probability and UncertaintyConstant (mathematics)Mathematical economicsFinanceSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)
researchProduct

The beer market and advertising expenditure

2009

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the impacts of advertising expenditure on brands' market shares, utilizing a novel four‐week advertising‐sales data from the highly competitive oligopolistic Finnish beer market in which price competition among the homogeneous larger‐type beer brands is not allowed during the period of the study.Design/methodology/approachCompetition is modelled using the Lanchester model. The impacts of advertising on market shares are estimated using the impulse‐response functions from vector autoregression, and the full information maximum likelihood and advertising elasticities.FindingsSome new insights into beer market dynamics are obtained. First, the imp…

MarketingCompetition (economics)OligopolyHomogeneousValue (economics)EconomicsAdvertisingCompetitor analysisMarket dynamicsMarket shareVector autoregressionMarketing Intelligence & Planning
researchProduct

“Let’s make lots of money”: the determinants of performance in the recorded music sector

2017

This research analyzes the performance of 467 record labels in eight European countries over a period of 13 years (2003-2015). The main goal is to explain a relative measure of profitability in terms of observed variables, although the nature of the dataset also allows us to include non-observed firm and country effects. To this end alternative models are estimated and three main research questions are tested, namely: (1) the effect of the dual structure of the recorded music market, in which a competitive segment and an oligopoly coexist; (2) the extent and source of the volatility of profits in record labels; and (3) the nonlinear impact of size on performance.

Measure (data warehouse)Return on assets05 social sciencesEconomics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)EconomiaCultural economicsDual (category theory)MicroeconomicsOligopoly0502 economics and businessEconomicsProfitability index050207 economicsVolatility (finance)050203 business & managementPeriod (music)Journal of Cultural Economics
researchProduct

R&D WITH SPILLOVERS: MONOPOLY VERSUS NONCOOPERATIVE AND COOPERATIVE DUOPOLY

2010

This paper compares industry profit and R&D propensity for a duopoly conducting either noncooperative or cooperative R&D and a monopoly, using two different basic models of strategic R&D. One postulates spillovers in R&D inputs and predicts that equilibrium joint profit and R&D levels are always larger under monopoly. The other postulates spillovers in R&D outputs and sometimes predicts that joint profit and R&D levels are larger under either of the alternative scenarios. In addition, unlike input spillovers, spillovers in R&D outputs sometimes exert a positive effect on both effective and private noncooperative R&D levels.

MicroeconomicsEconomics and EconometricsEconomicsMonopolyDuopolyOligopoly theoryProfit (economics)The Manchester School
researchProduct

Strategic behavior and partial cost sharing

2003

Abstract The main objects here are games in which players mainly compete but nonetheless collaborate on some subsidiary activities. Play assumes a two-stage nature in that first-stage moves presume coordination of some subsequent tasks. Specifically, we consider instances where second-stage coordination amounts to partial cost sharing, anticipated and sustained as a core solution. Examples include regional Cournot oligopolies with joint transportation. We define and characterize equilibria, and inquire about their existence.

MicroeconomicsOligopolyEconomics and EconometricsCore (game theory)symbols.namesakeNash equilibriumStrategic behaviorEconomicssymbolsCost sharingCournot competitionFinanceGames and Economic Behavior
researchProduct

Asymmetric Demand Information and Foreign Direct Investment

2007

We examine the FDI versus exports decision of firms competing in an oligopolistic (quantitysetting) market under demand uncertainty and asymmetric information. Compared to a firm that chooses to export, a firm that chooses to set up a plant in the host market has superior information about local market demand. In addition to the well-known tension between the fixed set-up costs of investment, the additional variable costs of exports and oligopoly sizes, the incentive to invest abroad is explained by the strategic learning effect. FDI may be observed even if trade costs are zero. The analysis is robust to price competition and to the possibility that a foreign firm can engage in both FDI and…

OligopolyCompetition (economics)MicroeconomicsEconomics and EconometricsIncentiveInformation asymmetryEconomicsForeign direct investmentInvestment (macroeconomics)Variable costSupply and demandScandinavian Journal of Economics
researchProduct

R&D Network Formation with Myopic and Farsighted Firms

2018

We study the formation of R&D networks when each firm benefits from the research done by other firms it is connected to. Firms can be either myopic or farsighted when deciding about the links they want to form. We propose the notion of myopic-farsighted stable set to determine the R&D networks that emerge in the long run. When the majority of firms is myopic, stability leads to R&D networks consisting of either two asymmetric components with the largest component comprises three-quarters of firms or two symmetric components of nearly equal size with the largest component having only myopic firms. But, once the majority of firms becomes farsighted, only R&D networks with two asymmetric compo…

OligopolyConstraint (information theory)Component (UML)Single componentIndependent setStability (learning theory)EconomicsEqual sizeMathematical economicsNetwork formationSSRN Electronic Journal
researchProduct